Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding the Sarkaria Commission.
(i) It was a three-member commission appointed in 1983 to examine Centre-state relations.
(ii) It recommended that the residuary powers of taxation should remain with the Parliament.
(iii) All 247 recommendations of the commission were rejected by the Central government.

AOnly (i) and (ii)

BOnly (i) and (iii)

COnly (ii) and (iii)

DAll the above (i, ii, iii)

Answer:

A. Only (i) and (ii)

Read Explanation:

Understanding the Sarkaria Commission

  • The Sarkaria Commission was a significant body appointed by the Central Government to examine and review the working of the existing arrangements between the Union and States in India.
  • Its primary objective was to recommend appropriate changes to strengthen Centre-State relations, keeping in mind the unity and integrity of the country.

Key Facts about the Sarkaria Commission:

  • It was constituted in June 1983 by the Government of India.
  • The commission was a three-member body:
    • Chairman: Justice R.S. Sarkaria (a retired judge of the Supreme Court of India).
    • Members: Shri B. Sivaraman and Dr. S.R. Sen.
  • The commission was given a broad mandate to review the entire gamut of Centre-State relations, covering legislative, administrative, and financial aspects.
  • It submitted its final report containing 247 recommendations in January 1988.

Recommendations and Their Fate:

  • The statement that it recommended that the residuary powers of taxation should remain with the Parliament is correct. The Commission upheld the constitutional scheme, which vests residuary legislative powers (including taxation) with the Parliament (Article 248 and Entry 97 of the Union List).
  • The statement that all 247 recommendations of the commission were rejected by the Central government is incorrect. While not all recommendations were implemented, a significant number were accepted and implemented, either fully or partially, over time.
  • One of the most crucial recommendations that was accepted and implemented was the establishment of the Inter-State Council under Article 263 of the Constitution. This Council was set up in 1990 to facilitate coordination between states and the Centre.
  • Other significant recommendations included:
    • Limiting the use of Article 356 (President's Rule) to extreme cases.
    • Consultation with the Chief Minister for the appointment of the Governor.
    • Strengthening the All India Services (IAS, IPS, IFS).
    • Measures to enhance financial autonomy and resource sharing for states.
    • Making the legislative process for certain state bills more consultative.
  • The recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission have served as a foundational text for debates and reforms related to Centre-State relations in India and continue to be relevant for governance discussions.

Related Questions:

Which of the following statements are correct about the removal of SPSC members?

  1. The Governor can suspend a member of the SPSC during an enquiry into misbehaviour.

  2. The President can remove a member of the SPSC if they are found to be insolvent.

  3. The Supreme Court’s advice is advisory and not binding on the President in cases of misbehaviour.

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding the Inter-State Council:

  1. The Inter-State Council Secretariat, established in 1991, also functions as the secretariat for the Zonal Councils since 2011.

  2. The Council’s standing committee is chaired by the Prime Minister.

  3. The Council can investigate and discuss subjects of common interest between the Centre and the states.

Which of the following statements about the term 'misbehaviour' for an SPSC member is correct?

  1. The term is defined in the Indian Penal Code and applied to SPSC members by the President.

  2. A member is deemed guilty of misbehaviour if they are concerned or interested in any contract made by the Government of India or a state government.

With reference to parliamentary legislation in the State List, consider the following statements:

  1. A Rajya Sabha resolution under Article 249 requires a two-thirds majority of members present and voting.

  2. Laws made by Parliament under Article 252 can be amended or repealed by state legislatures.

  3. During President’s rule, laws made by Parliament on State List matters remain in force indefinitely unless repealed by the state legislature.

  4. Parliament can legislate on State List matters to implement international agreements without state consent.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Consider the following statements with regard to the Doctrine of Pleasure:

(i) The Doctrine of Pleasure allows the President or Governor to terminate a civil servant’s service without providing any notice, based on public policy.
(ii) The tenure of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is subject to the pleasure of the President.
(iii) The Supreme Court in the case of Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (1985) held that the Doctrine of Pleasure is based on public policy rather than a feudal prerogative.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?