Question

David Easton’s premise of Verification is aligned with:

I. Adopting appropriate methods for data collection and interpretation (Techniques).

II. Accepting knowledge only if it is derived through systematic, logical reasoning, ignoring empirical testing.

III. Viewing measurement and manipulation of data as secondary to conceptual generalization.

Which of the following is correct?

• A. I only
• B. II only
• C. I and III only
• D. I, II, and III

Answer 1

Answer:

A. I only

David Easton's Premise of Verification

Political scientist David Easton, in his work, emphasized the importance of verification in the study of politics. This premise is fundamentally aligned with the scientific method, which underpins much of political science research.

Key Aspects of Verification in Easton's View:

• Empirical Orientation: Verification requires that political statements and theories be testable against observable reality. This means that knowledge claims must be grounded in empirical evidence that can be collected and analyzed.
• Systematic Data Collection and Interpretation (Techniques): To achieve verification, researchers must employ rigorous and appropriate methods for gathering and interpreting data. This includes the use of systematic techniques to ensure reliability and validity of findings.
• Logical Reasoning and Empirical Testing: While logical reasoning is crucial for developing hypotheses and theories, verification necessitates that these be subjected to empirical testing. Knowledge is accepted only if it withstands scrutiny through systematic observation and measurement.
• Role of Measurement and Generalization: While conceptual generalization is a goal of political science, it must be built upon a foundation of empirical data that has been measured and analyzed. Measurement and manipulation of data are not secondary but rather essential steps towards valid generalizations.

Relevance to the Provided Statements:

• Statement I: Adopting appropriate methods for data collection and interpretation (Techniques). This statement directly aligns with Easton's premise. Verification relies heavily on the quality and appropriateness of the methods used to gather and analyze empirical data.
• Statement II: Accepting knowledge only if it is derived through systematic, logical reasoning, ignoring empirical testing. This statement is contrary to Easton's premise. While logical reasoning is important, ignoring empirical testing would lead to unsubstantiated claims, which is precisely what the premise of verification seeks to avoid.
• Statement III: Viewing measurement and manipulation of data as secondary to conceptual generalization. This statement is also inconsistent with Easton's premise. Empirical verification gives primacy to observable facts and data, meaning that measurement and data analysis are fundamental, not secondary, to achieving valid generalizations.

Conclusion for Competitive Exams:

When faced with questions about verification in political science, particularly in the context of David Easton, focus on the emphasis on empirical evidence, systematic methods, and testability. The core idea is that political theories must be grounded in observable reality and rigorously tested to be considered valid knowledge.