Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements about the Punchhi Commission are correct?

  1. It recommended fixed five-year tenures for governors.

  2. It proposed guidelines for the governor’s role in case of a hung assembly.

  3. It recommended that governors should continue as chancellors of universities.

A1 and 2 only

B2 and 3 only

C1 and 3 only

DAll are correct

Answer:

A. 1 and 2 only

Read Explanation:

Punchhi Commission: Key Facts and Recommendations

  • The Punchhi Commission on Centre-State Relations was constituted by the Government of India in 2007.
  • It was chaired by Justice Madan Mohan Punchhi, a former Chief Justice of India. The Commission submitted its report in 2010.
  • Its primary mandate was to examine and review the working of the existing arrangements between the Union and States and recommend changes to address contemporary challenges.

Recommendations related to Governors:

  • The Commission recommended a fixed five-year tenure for Governors. It suggested that the 'doctrine of pleasure' should be removed from the Constitution, and Governors should be removed only by a resolution of the State Legislature, similar to the President's impeachment process.
  • It proposed clear guidelines for the Governor's role in the event of a hung assembly (where no single party or pre-poll alliance achieves a clear majority). The guidelines suggested inviting the leader of the single largest pre-poll alliance first, or the single largest party if no pre-poll alliance exists, to form the government and prove their majority on the floor of the House within a reasonable time.
  • Contrary to one of the statements, the Punchhi Commission recommended that Governors should not continue as Chancellors of universities. It suggested that this role should be separated from the office of Governor to reduce potential for political interference and allow the Governor to focus solely on constitutional duties. This aims to depoliticize the university administration.

Other Significant Recommendations:

  • The Commission reiterated that Article 356 (President's Rule) should be used only as a last resort, aligning with the Supreme Court's pronouncements in the S.R. Bommai case (1994).
  • It recommended that the Centre should consult states before formulating treaties with foreign countries that might affect state interests.
  • The Commission also suggested exploring possibilities of sharing mineral revenue with states and allowing states to levy taxes on certain services to improve their financial autonomy.

Related Questions:

With reference to the Centre’s control over state legislation, consider the following statements:

  1. The Governor can reserve any state bill for the President’s consideration, who holds an absolute veto over it.

  2. A state bill restricting freedom of trade and commerce requires prior presidential permission under Article 304.

  3. During a financial emergency, all state bills must be reserved for the President’s consideration.

  4. The Centre can issue directions to states to ensure compliance with parliamentary laws under Article 365.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Which of the following statements are correct regarding the Punchhi Commission’s recommendations?
(i) Governors should be given a fixed tenure of five years, and their removal should not be at the Centre’s discretion.
(ii) The Inter-State Council should have a continuing auditing role in matters of concurrent jurisdiction.
(iii) The All-India Services should be abolished to enhance state autonomy.

Which of the following statements regarding the removal and suspension of SPSC members are correct?

  1. The Governor has the power to suspend an SPSC member during a Supreme Court enquiry into their conduct.

  2. The President is constitutionally bound by the advice given by the Supreme Court in cases of removal for misbehaviour.

  3. The Governor can remove a member for reasons of insolvency or physical incapacity without presidential intervention.

If a State fails to comply with directions issued under Article 256, what is the ultimate sanction available to the Union?

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding the Anandpur Sahib Resolution.
(i) It was adopted by the Akali Dal in 1973 and demanded that the Centre’s jurisdiction be limited to defence, foreign affairs, communications, and currency.
(ii) It proposed that the Constitution should be federal, ensuring equal authority and representation for all states at the Centre.
(iii) The resolution was fully endorsed by the Central government.