Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements are not associated with the Advocate General’s qualifications?

i. The Advocate General must be a citizen of India.

ii. The Advocate General must have been an advocate for 15 years in a High Court.

iii. The Advocate General must be a resident of the state they serve.

iv. The Advocate General must have held a judicial office for 10 years as an alternative qualification.

Ai, ii, and iii are incorrect statements

Bii and iii are incorrect statements

Ciii and iv are incorrect statements

Diii and iv are incorrect statements

Answer:

B. ii and iii are incorrect statements

Read Explanation:

Advocate General of a State

  • Constitutional Basis: Article 165 of the Indian Constitution deals with the Advocate General for the State.

  • Appointment: The Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the respective state.

  • Qualifications: To be appointed as the Advocate General, a person must meet the following criteria:

    • Must be a citizen of India.

    • Must have held a judicial office in India for at least ten years; OR

    • Must have been a barrister or advocate for at least ten years in any High Court in the territory of India.

  • Role and Functions: The Advocate General is the chief legal advisor to the state government and performs functions conferred on him by the Constitution or any other law.

  • Disqualification: The Constitution does not specify any grounds for disqualification, but the Governor can remove the Advocate General at any time.

Analysis of the Statements:

  • Statement (i) is correct: Citizenship of India is a mandatory qualification.

  • Statement (ii) is incorrect: The required experience as an advocate in a High Court is ten years, not fifteen years.

  • Statement (iii) is incorrect: While the Advocate General typically resides in the state they serve, it is not a constitutionally mandated qualification. The primary qualification relates to legal experience and citizenship.

  • Statement (iv) is correct: Holding a judicial office for ten years is an alternative qualification.

Key Takeaways for Exams:

  • Focus on the specific numbers mentioned in the qualifications (e.g., 10 years).

  • Understand the appointing authority (Governor) and the relevant Article (Article 165).

  • Distinguish between mandatory qualifications and usual practices.


Related Questions:

Consider the following statements regarding the CAG’s audit powers:

Statement I: The CAG can call for any records or documents from audited entities.

Statement II: The CAG has no authority to question persons in charge of audited offices.

Statement III: The CAG audits all stores and stock in government offices.

Which of the following is correct?

Match the following constitutional provisions with their correct descriptions:

(i) Article 165 – Advocate General of State

(ii) Article 177 – Powers, privileges, and immunities of Advocate General

(iii) Article 194 – Rights of Advocate General in State Legislature

(iv) Article 76 – Appointment of Advocate General

Which of the above pairs is/are correctly matched?

കോൺസ്റ്റിട്യൂവൻറ് അസംബ്ലി ഇന്ത്യൻ ഭരണഘടന അംഗീകരിച്ചതിൻ്റെ 75-ാം വാർഷികം ആചരിച്ചത് എന്നാണ് ?
Which committee relates to study poverty line?

Which of the following statements is/are correct about the Advocate General’s privileges?

i. The Advocate General enjoys all privileges and immunities available to state legislature members.

ii. The Advocate General’s remuneration is fixed by the Constitution.

iii. The Advocate General can participate in the proceedings of the state legislature’s committees.