Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads

A statement is given followed by two conclusions. Find which conclusion is TRUE based on the given statement.

Statement:
C = A ≤ T < D ≥ O; G ≥ D < S; T ≥ A
Conclusions:

  1. A < O
  2. C < G

AOnly II

BOnly I

CEither I or II

DNeither I nor II

Answer:

A. Only II

Read Explanation:

Analyzing the Logical Statement

  • The given statement provides a series of inequalities: C = A ≤ T < D ≥ O and G ≥ D < S.
  • From these, we can establish a clear chain of relationships between the variables.

Evaluating Conclusion I: A < O

  • To determine the relationship between A and O, we must trace the path: A ≤ T < D ≥ O.
  • Here, the relationship between T and D is T < D, and the relationship between D and O is D ≥ O.
  • Because there are conflicting signs between T and O (specifically, the inequality directions point towards D from both sides), a definite relationship between A and O cannot be established.
  • Therefore, A < O is not necessarily true.

Evaluating Conclusion II: C < G

  • To determine the relationship between C and G, trace the path: C = A ≤ T < D ≤ G.
  • Combining the components: C = A and A ≤ T means C ≤ T.
  • Given T < D and D ≤ G (from G ≥ D), the combined inequality chain becomes C ≤ T < D ≤ G.
  • Since T < D involves a strict inequality (<), this relationship forces C < G to be true.
  • The presence of at least one strict inequality sign (<) in the path between C and G ensures that the relationship holds.

Key Takeaways for Exams

  • Check for Conflicting Signs: Whenever a path between two variables contains both > and < symbols, no definite relationship can be concluded between those variables.
  • Strict Inequality Rule: If there is at least one strict inequality sign (< or >) in the chain, the final relationship must be a strict inequality.
  • Equality and Inequality: If C = A and A ≤ T, then C ≤ T. If the chain subsequently contains a strict inequality, the final result will be strict (e.g., C < T).

Related Questions:

In this question, three statements are given followed by two conclusions. Choose the conclusion(s) which best fit(s) logically. Statements: 1) Some Mumbai is Delhi. 2) Some Kolkata is Mumbai. 3) Some Chennai is Delhi. Conclusions: I. All Kolkata is Chennai. II. No Chennai is Kolkata.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some peanuts are engines. All coats are shoes. All shoes are engines. Conclusions: (I) All coats are engines. (II) Some peanuts are coats
In a certain code language 'PGMS' is coded as '9-18-12-6' and 'TBRX' is coded as '5-23-7-1'. What is the code for 'KAVO' in the given language ?
Each of the letters in the word STAMINA is arranged in alphabetical order. How many letters are there in the English alphabetical series between the letter that is first from the left and the one that is fourth from the right in the new letter-cluster formed?
The ratio of two numbers is 4:5 and their sum is 180. Find the numbers.