Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Consider the following statements about amendments by simple majority of Parliament:

  1. These are not considered amendments under Article 368.

  2. They include provisions on the creation of new states.

  3. They require ratification by state legislatures.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 and 2 only

B2 and 3 only

C1 only

D1, 2 and 3

Answer:

A. 1 and 2 only

Read Explanation:

Amendments by Simple Majority in the Indian Parliament

Understanding the Different Amendment Procedures

  • The Constitution of India provides for different procedures for amending its provisions. These can broadly be categorized into three types: amendments by a simple majority, amendments by a special majority, and amendments by a special majority plus ratification by half of the states.

Amendments by Simple Majority

  • Provisions that can be amended by a simple majority of the Parliament do not fall under the purview of Article 368 of the Constitution, which deals with the amendment of the Constitution.
  • Therefore, these are often referred to as 'notional' amendments or statutory changes rather than constitutional amendments in the strict sense defined by Article 368.
  • Examples of such amendments include:
    • Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states (as per Article 3). This is a crucial point often tested in competitive exams. For instance, the creation of Telangana from Andhra Pradesh was done through a simple majority.
    • Changes in the rules of business of Parliament.
    • Use of English language in High Courts.
    • Citizenship provisions (other than those requiring special majority).
    • Provisions related to the Fifth and Sixth Schedules.
  • These types of amendments do not require ratification by the state legislatures. This is a key distinction from amendments made under Article 368 that affect federal provisions.

Amendments by Special Majority (Article 368)

  • Amendments requiring a special majority (a majority of the total membership of each House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting) are dealt with under Article 368.
  • These amendments are considered formal amendments to the Constitution.

Amendments by Special Majority plus Ratification

  • Certain provisions, particularly those affecting the federal structure of the Constitution (e.g., election of the President, powers of the Union and State executives, Supreme Court, High Courts, representation of states in Parliament, etc.), require amendments by a special majority and ratification by at least half of the state legislatures.

Key Takeaway for Exams

  • It is vital to distinguish between amendments made by simple majority and those made under Article 368. Provisions related to the formation and alteration of states are typically amended by a simple majority and are hence not considered amendments under Article 368, nor do they require state ratification.

Related Questions:

Which of the following statements are correct regarding the qualifications for the Attorney General?
(i) An eminent jurist, in the opinion of the President, is eligible to be appointed as the Attorney General.
(ii) A person who has been an advocate of a High Court for 10 years meets one of the eligibility criteria for the office.
(iii) A person must have been a High Court judge for 10 years or a High Court advocate for 5 years to be qualified.

Which of the following statement(s) about the Advocate General's qualifications and tenure is/are accurate?
i. A person is qualified to be Advocate General if they have been a judicial officer for 10 years or an advocate of a High Court for 10 years.
ii. The Constitution does not fix the Advocate General's term of office.
iii. The Governor determines the Advocate General's remuneration.
iv. The Advocate General must resign when the Chief Minister changes, as per constitutional mandate.

With respect to the constitutional provisions related to Zonal Councils, consider the following statements:

  1. Article 263 provides for the establishment of an Inter-State Council.

  2. Zonal Councils are statutory bodies, not constitutional bodies.

  3. Article 262 deals with disputes related to inter-state river waters.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

Assertion (A): The Advocate General can participate in state legislature proceedings but cannot vote.

Reason (R): The Advocate General is a member of the state legislature with limited rights to ensure separation of powers.

With reference to the duties of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, consider the following statements:
i. The CAG audits all receipts and expenditures of bodies substantially financed from central or state revenues.
ii. The CAG has the authority to prescribe the form of accounts for the Centre and states under Article 150.
iii. The CAG audits the accounts of private companies not receiving government funds.
iv. The CAG acts as a guide, friend, and philosopher to the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament.

Which of the statements given above are correct?