Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Consider the following statements about the historical instances of National Emergency in India.

  1. The first National Emergency was declared in 1962 due to the Indo-China War and was revoked in 1968.

  2. The second and third National Emergencies were both lifted on March 21, 1977.

  3. The Shah Commission was appointed to inquire into the atrocities during the National Emergency of 1971.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 and 2 only

B1 and 3 only

C2 and 3 only

DAll of the above

Answer:

A. 1 and 2 only

Read Explanation:

National Emergency in India

  • A National Emergency in India is declared under Article 352 of the Indian Constitution. It can be proclaimed by the President when the security of India or any part of its territory is threatened by war, external aggression, or armed rebellion.

  • Originally, Article 352 mentioned 'internal disturbance' instead of 'armed rebellion.' The term 'armed rebellion' was added by the 44th Amendment Act of 1978.

  • Proclamation of Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within one month by a special majority. It can remain in force for six months at a time and can be extended indefinitely with parliamentary approval every six months.

Historical Instances of National Emergency:

  • The First National Emergency was declared on October 26, 1962, due to the Chinese aggression (Indo-China War). This emergency was in force for a prolonged period and was finally revoked on January 10, 1968. This period also saw the Indo-Pak War of 1965.

  • The Second National Emergency was proclaimed on December 3, 1971, because of the Indo-Pak War that led to the creation of Bangladesh. This emergency was based on external aggression.

  • The Third National Emergency was declared on June 25, 1975, by President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed on the advice of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. This emergency was controversial as it was based on the grounds of 'internal disturbance' and is widely regarded as an abuse of power, leading to widespread arrests and suppression of civil liberties.

  • Both the Second (1971) and Third (1975) National Emergencies were simultaneously revoked on March 21, 1977. This revocation occurred after the Congress government lost the general elections of 1977 and the Janata Party came to power.

The Shah Commission:

  • The Shah Commission of Inquiry was appointed by the Janata Party government on May 28, 1977. It was headed by Justice J.C. Shah, a former Chief Justice of India.

  • Its primary mandate was to inquire into all the excesses, malpractices, and abuses of authority committed during the Third National Emergency of 1975-1977. The commission's findings highlighted the widespread human rights violations and constitutional deviations that occurred during that period.

  • Therefore, the Shah Commission was associated with the 1975 emergency, not the 1971 emergency.


Related Questions:

Which of the following statements are correct about the differences between Articles 358 and 359?

(i) Article 358 applies only to External Emergencies, while Article 359 applies to both External and Internal Emergencies.

(ii) Article 358 automatically suspends Article 19, while Article 359 requires a Presidential Order to suspend specified Fundamental Rights.

(iii) Article 358 allows the suspension of Articles 20 and 21, while Article 359 does not.

With reference to the history of President's Rule in Kerala, which of the following statements is correct?

  1. Kerala was the first state in India where President's Rule was imposed after the enactment of the Constitution.

  2. The longest continuous period of President's Rule in Kerala was from 1964 to 1967.

  3. President's Rule has been imposed in Kerala a total of 11 times, the most for any state in India.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

"The emergency due to the breakdown of constitutional machinery in a state :
What is the constitutional part relating to the declaration of emergency?

When President's Rule is imposed in a state, which of the following consequences occur?

  1. The President dismisses the state council of ministers headed by the chief minister.

  2. The President assumes the powers of the state's High Court and can suspend its constitutional provisions.

  3. The Parliament becomes empowered to legislate on subjects in the State List for that state.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?