Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Consider the following statements with reference to the Financial Emergency under Article 360:

  1. Unlike President's Rule, once a proclamation of Financial Emergency is approved by Parliament, it continues indefinitely without the need for repeated parliamentary approval.

  2. During a Financial Emergency, the President can direct the reduction of salaries and allowances of all persons serving the Union, including the judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts.

  3. India has declared a Financial Emergency on three separate occasions, primarily linked to global economic downturns.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 only

B1 and 2 only

C2 and 3 only

D1, 2 and 3

Answer:

B. 1 and 2 only

Read Explanation:

Understanding Financial Emergency (Article 360)

  • The provision for Financial Emergency is enshrined in Article 360 of the Indian Constitution. It allows the President to declare such an emergency if he is satisfied that the financial stability or credit of India, or any part of its territory, is threatened.
  • This provision was borrowed from the Government of India Act, 1935, where it was known as 'financial provisions in cases of grave emergency'.
  • The objective of this provision is to safeguard the financial stability and credit of India in times of severe economic distress.

Approval and Duration

  • A proclamation declaring a Financial Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months from the date of its issue.
  • If the Lok Sabha is dissolved within this two-month period, or before its approval, the proclamation remains valid for 30 days from the first sitting of the newly constituted Lok Sabha, provided the Rajya Sabha has already approved it.
  • Crucially, once approved by Parliament, a proclamation of Financial Emergency continues indefinitely until it is revoked by the President. Unlike National Emergency (Article 352) or President's Rule (Article 356), there is no maximum period prescribed for its operation, nor does it require repeated parliamentary approval for its continuance.

Powers Exercised During Financial Emergency

  • During a Financial Emergency, the Union executive's authority extends to giving directions to any State to observe specific canons of financial propriety.
  • The President can direct the reduction of salaries and allowances of all or any class of persons serving the Union. This power specifically includes the judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, highlighting the far-reaching nature of this emergency provision.
  • The President can also direct the reduction of salaries and allowances of persons serving the States.
  • All Money Bills or other financial bills passed by the State Legislature are required to be reserved for the consideration of the President.

Historical Context

  • It is a significant fact for competitive examinations that India has never declared a Financial Emergency under Article 360 to date.
  • Despite facing various economic challenges and crises, such as the balance of payments crisis in 1991, the government has managed such situations through other economic reforms and measures without invoking Article 360.

Related Questions:

ഇന്ത്യൻ ഭരണഘടനയുടെ ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 360 പ്രകാരം സാമ്പത്തിക അടിയന്തരാവസ്ഥയുമായി ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട താഴെപ്പറയുന്ന പ്രസ്താവനകൾ പരിഗണിക്കുക.

1. സാമ്പത്തിക അടിയന്തരാവസ്ഥ പിൻവലിക്കുന്നതിന് പരമാവധി മൂന്ന് വർഷമാണ് ഭരണഘടന അനുശാസിക്കുന്നത്.

2. പ്രഖ്യാപനം റദ്ദാക്കുന്നതിന് പാർലമെൻ്റിൻ്റെ അംഗീകാരം ആവശ്യമില്ല.

3. ഇന്ത്യയിൽ ഇന്നുവരെ സാമ്പത്തിക അടിയന്തരാവസ്ഥ ഏർപ്പെടുത്തിയിട്ടില്ല.

മുകളിൽ പറഞ്ഞതിൽ എത്രയെണ്ണം ശരിയല്ല ?

Who declares emergency in India?
How many kinds of emergencies are there under the Constitution of India?
In which case the Supreme Court held that the proclamation of a national emergency can be challenged in a court?

Regarding the imposition of President's Rule, consider the following:

Assertion (A): The President can impose President's Rule in a state even without a report from the Governor.
Reason (R): The 44th Amendment Act of 1978 affirmed that the satisfaction of the President in invoking Article 356 is not subject to judicial review.

Which of the above are true?