Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Consider the following two statements:

Statement I: The Indian Constitution mandates that the State Finance Commission must have one chairman and two members.

Statement II: The chairman or a member must wait for the Governor's acceptance of their resignation before they can demit office.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

ABoth Statement I and Statement II are correct.

BBoth Statement I and Statement II are incorrect.

CStatement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.

DStatement I is incorrect, but Statement II is correct.

Answer:

D. Statement I is incorrect, but Statement II is correct.

Read Explanation:

State Finance Commission (SFC) Composition and Resignation of Members

  • The State Finance Commission (SFC) is a constitutional body established to review the financial position of Panchayats and Municipalities and recommend measures to augment the consolidated fund of the State to supplement the resources of the Panchayats and Municipalities.
  • Statement I Analysis:
    • The Constitution of India does not specify a fixed number of members for the State Finance Commission.
    • Article 243-I and 243-Y of the Constitution state that the Governor may by law make provisions with respect to the composition of the State Finance Commission.
    • Therefore, the composition, including the number of chairmen and members, is determined by the respective State Legislatures through legislation. It is not mandated to be one chairman and two members by the Indian Constitution itself.
  • Statement II Analysis:
    • Members of the State Finance Commission, including the chairman, hold office during the pleasure of the Governor.
    • However, when it comes to resignation, the procedure is that a member or the chairman submits their resignation to the Governor.
    • The resignation is deemed effective only after the Governor accepts it. Until such acceptance, the member or chairman continues to hold office. This is a standard procedure for many constitutional and statutory appointments to ensure a smooth transition and prevent abrupt departures.
    • This provision ensures that the functioning of the commission is not disrupted by sudden resignations and that a successor can be appointed in time.

Related Questions:

Which organization played a crucial role in advocating for the implementation of NOTA in India?
Kerala Administrative Tribunal was established as part of constitutional adjudicative system. Which of the following is not related to the above statement? ..................................................................................................... (i) Swaran Singh Committee (ii) Article 323 A (iii) 42 Amendment. (iv) CISKAT
Article 330 to 342 of Indian Constitution belong to ?

Which of the following statements regarding NOTA in India is correct?

  1. NOTA was implemented after the Supreme Court verdict in 2013.
  2. NOTA can overturn election results if it gets a near majority of votes
  3. The NOTA symbol was introduced in 2015.
    Which of the following article of Indian Constitution dealt with the appointment of attorney general of India ?