(i) The statement is incorrect: The statement as a standalone assertion that projects can be started might lead one to believe it's always easy, but it comes with strict conditions. However, the core of the issue is the requirements for such projects.
(ii) Clearance from the National Board for Wildlife is required: This is correct. For any development project within or in the vicinity (often interpreted as 10km radius, though ESZ boundaries vary) of a Protected Area, clearance from the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) is mandatory. This is a critical central clearance.
(iii) Permission from the State Forest Department is required: This is also correct. Even if central clearance (NBWL) is obtained, the project must also comply with state-level forest and environmental regulations, and permission from the concerned State Forest Department would be required for activities within their jurisdiction, especially within designated forest areas or ESZs.
(iv) Permission from the State Forest Department is not required: This is incorrect, as explained above.
Given the options, (ii) and (iii) accurately describe the necessary clearances for such projects. The initial statement that projects can be started implies that it's possible, provided these clearances are met.
