APart X
BPart I
CPart XX
DPart XVIII
APart X
BPart I
CPart XX
DPart XVIII
Related Questions:
Consider the following statements about the judicial review of emergency provisions.
The 38th Amendment Act of 1975 made the declaration of a National Emergency immune from judicial review.
The Minerva Mills case (1980) held that a National Emergency proclamation can be challenged on grounds of malafide or irrelevance.
The satisfaction of the President in imposing President’s Rule under Article 356 is beyond judicial review after the 44th Amendment Act of 1978.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Consider the following about effects of National Emergency:
The President can modify the distribution of revenues between Centre and States during Emergency.
The life of Lok Sabha can be extended for a maximum of three years during Emergency.
State legislatures get suspended during National Emergency.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?