Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
Enforcement of which among the following fundamental rights cannot be suspended during proclamation of emergency?

AArticle 14 and 20

BArticle 19 and 20

CArticle 20 and 21

DNone of the above

Answer:

C. Article 20 and 21

Read Explanation:

  • The fundamental rights guaranteed by Article 20 (Protection in respect of conviction for offences) and Article 21 (Protection of life and personal liberty) cannot be suspended during a proclamation of emergency, whether it is a national or state emergency

  • Article 20 - This article provides three key protections to a person accused of a crime

  • No ex post facto law (no punishment for an act that was not a crime at the time it was committed).

  • No double jeopardy (no one can be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once).

  • No self-incrimination (no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself).

  • Article 21 - This article states, "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

  • " It is considered the most important fundamental right, and the Supreme Court has interpreted it to include a wide range of rights, such as the right to a clean environment, the right to health, and the right to a speedy trial


Related Questions:

Consider the following statements about the differences between Articles 358 and 359 of the Indian Constitution.

  1. Article 358 suspends Fundamental Rights under Article 19 only during an External Emergency, while Article 359 applies to both External and Internal Emergencies.

  2. Article 358 automatically suspends Fundamental Rights under Article 19, while Article 359 requires a Presidential Order to suspend the enforcement of specified Fundamental Rights.

  3. Article 359 allows the suspension of the enforcement of Articles 20 and 21 during an emergency.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Which constitutional amendment restored the power of judicial review of fundamental rights curtailed during the Emergency?

Consider the following statements:

  1. Article 355 obliges the Centre to protect states from external aggression and internal disturbance.

  2. The first state to have President’s Rule imposed after Constitution came into force was Kerala.

  3. The President can assume powers of state High Court during President’s Rule.

Which are correct?

ഭരണഘടനയുടെ ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 356 ഉപയോഗിച്ച് സഭയിൽ ഭൂരിപക്ഷം ഉണ്ടായിരുന്ന ഒരു സംസ്ഥാന മന്ത്രി സഭയെ പിരിച്ചുവിട്ട് രാഷ്ട്രപതി ഭരണം ഏർപ്പെടുത്തപ്പെട്ട ആദ്യ സംസ്ഥാനം?

Consider the following statements about President’s Rule in Indian states.

  1. The first state to experience President’s Rule after the enactment of the Constitution was Punjab in 1951.

  2. Kerala has experienced President’s Rule seven times, with the longest period being from 1964 to 1967.

  3. Manipur holds the record for the most instances of President’s Rule, imposed 11 times.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?