Challenger Logo

Challenger App

Get it on Google PlayGet it on App Store
Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads
Get App
Find the best option that best completes the analogy. NPR: OOS :: XYZ : ?

AYZA

BZAB

CYAC

DYAZ

Answer:

A. YZA

Read Explanation:

You are correct. The pattern is:

NPR → OOS

  • N → O (+1)

  • P → O (−1)

  • R → S (+1)

Applying the same pattern to XYZ:

  • X → Y (+1)

  • Y → Z (+1)

  • Z → A (+1, cyclic order)

So the resulting letter-cluster is YZA.

Related Questions:

P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W are sitting around a circular table facing the centre(but not necessarily in the same order). P is sitting to the immediate right of V and third to the left of U. S is sitting fourth to the right of Q, who is not an immediate neighbour of P and T. Q is sitting to the second right of U. R is sitting to the immediate right of Q and second to the left of P.How many people are sitting between R and T when counted from the left of T?
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some onions are potatoes. No potato is a carrot. Conclusions: (I): No potato is an onion. (II): Some carrots are potatoes
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some pears are candles. All drillers are candles. Conclusions: (I): Some pears are drillers. (II): All candles are drillers
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All guns are bullets. No bullet is a cab. No bullet is a shoe. Conclusions: (I) : No gun is a cab. (II) : Some shoes are cabs
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some mobiles are tablets. Some tablets are laptops. All laptops are cameras. Conclusions: (I) Some cameras are tablets. (II) All laptops are mobiles.