If both State and Parliamentary law on a subject are repugnant under Articles 249 or 250, what happens?
AState law prevails
BBoth laws are valid
CSupreme Court decides the outcome
DParliamentary law prevails
No.1 PSC Learning App
★
★
★
★
★
Related Questions:
With reference to parliamentary legislation in the State List, consider the following statements:
A Rajya Sabha resolution under Article 249 requires a two-thirds majority of members present and voting.
Laws made by Parliament under Article 252 can be amended or repealed by state legislatures.
During President’s rule, laws made by Parliament on State List matters remain in force indefinitely unless repealed by the state legislature.
Parliament can legislate on State List matters to implement international agreements without state consent.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Consider the following statements regarding Administrative Relations.
(i) The President can establish an Inter-State Council to discuss matters of common interest between the Centre and states.
(ii) The mutual delegation of executive functions can occur only through an agreement between the Centre and states.
(iii) The Centre’s directions to states for the welfare of Scheduled Tribes are enforceable under Article 365.
Consider the following statements:
The power to extend the functions of an SPSC is vested in the Governor under Article 321.
Article 322 specifies that the expenses of the SPSC are charged on the Contingency Fund of the State.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
The constitution describes India as a
Which of the following statements are correct regarding the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)?
The UPSC is consulted on methods of recruitment, appointments, promotions, and transfers for All India Services and Central Services.
The chairman of the UPSC can be removed by the President only after an inquiry by the Supreme Court for misbehaviour.
The UPSC’s recommendations are binding on the Union Government.