If both State and Parliamentary law on a subject are repugnant under Articles 249 or 250, what happens?
AState law prevails
BBoth laws are valid
CSupreme Court decides the outcome
DParliamentary law prevails
No.1 PSC Learning App
★
★
★
★
★
Related Questions:
In which part of the Indian Constitution, legislative relation between centre and state is given ?
To which states does a law made by Parliament under Article 252 initially apply?
With reference to parliamentary legislation in the State List, consider the following statements:
A Rajya Sabha resolution under Article 249 requires a two-thirds majority of members present and voting.
Laws made by Parliament under Article 252 can be amended or repealed by state legislatures.
During President’s rule, laws made by Parliament on State List matters remain in force indefinitely unless repealed by the state legislature.
Parliament can legislate on State List matters to implement international agreements without state consent.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
If a State fails to comply with directions issued under Article 256, what is the ultimate sanction available to the Union?
Consider the following statements:
The power to extend the functions of an SPSC is vested in the Governor under Article 321.
Article 322 specifies that the expenses of the SPSC are charged on the Contingency Fund of the State.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?