Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statements:
1. No mobile is steel.
2. All steel are silver.
Conclusions:
I. Some silver are steel.
II. Some mobile are not silver.

AOnly conclusion I follows

BOnly conclusion II follows

CBoth I and II follow

DNeither I nor II follows

Answer:

A. Only conclusion I follows

Read Explanation:

 

 


Related Questions:

The statements below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears at variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.

Statements:

1) Some tables are sofas.

2) Some sofas are papers.

Conclusion:

I. Some sofas are tables.

II. Some papers are sofas.

In this question, three statements are given followed by two conclusions. Choose the conclusion(s) which best fit(s) logically. Statements: 1) Some Mumbai is Delhi. 2) Some Kolkata is Mumbai. 3) Some Chennai is Delhi. Conclusions: I. All Kolkata is Chennai. II. No Chennai is Kolkata.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some belts are socks. Some socks are pants. Conclusions: (I) All pants are belts. (II) Some socks are belts
In a certain code language 'PGMS' is coded as '9-18-12-6' and 'TBRX' is coded as '5-23-7-1'. What is the code for 'KAVO' in the given language ?

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

Some chickens are hens.

No hen is an egg.

Conclusions:

(l) No chicken is an egg.

(Il) All hens are chickens.