Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads

Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option.

Statement: Despite the unpredictability of future technologies, regulatory frameworks must evolve to preempt ethical crises.

Assumptions:

I. Unregulated technological growth can cause ethical dilemmas.

Il. Ethical standards are often retrofitted to existing technology.

IlI. Regulatory systems can always accurately predict technological outcomes.

AOnly I and II are implicit

BOnly I is implicit

CAll are implicit

DOnly II and III are implicit

Answer:

A. Only I and II are implicit

Read Explanation:

Let's examine each assumption:

Statement:

Despite the unpredictability of future technologies, regulatory frameworks must evolve to preempt ethical crises.

Assumption I:

"Unregulated technological growth can cause ethical dilemmas."
Valid.
The statement argues that regulations should evolve to prevent ethical crises, which assumes that without adequate regulation, technology may indeed create ethical problems.

Assumption II:

"Ethical standards are often retrofitted to existing technology."
Valid.
The use of the word "preempt" implies that waiting until after technology is developed is undesirable, suggesting that ethical standards have often been applied only after technologies already exist.

Assumption III:

"Regulatory systems can always accurately predict technological outcomes."
Not valid.
The statement explicitly acknowledges the unpredictability of future technologies. It only says regulations should evolve to anticipate ethical issues, not that regulators can always predict outcomes accurately.

Answer:

Only I and II are implicit


Related Questions:

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All doors are walls. All walls are floors. Conclusions: (I) All floors are walls. (II) Some floors are doors.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All lions are tigers. Some lions are cats. Conclusions: (I): All cats are lions. (II): Some tigers are cats.
Seven people A, B, C, D, E, F and G are sitting around a circular table, facing the center (but not necessarily in the same order). C is sitting to the immediate right of E. D is sitting third to the left of C. A is the immediate neighbour of B and C. F is not the immediate neighbour of E. What is the position of G with respect to A?
Six people, E, F, G, Q, R and S, are sitting in a row facing north (but not necessarily in the same order) . Only two people sit to the right of R. Only two people sit between R and E. Only one person sits between E and F. F sits to the immediate left of R. S sits to the immediate right of Q. How many people sit between Q and G?
"NQRP' is related to 'TWXV" in a certain way based on the English alphabetical order. In the same way, 'FHIG' is related to 'LNOM'. To which of the following is 'LOPN' related following the same logic?