App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
1. No pens are pencils.
2. No eraser is cup.
3. All pencils are erasers.
Conclusions:
I. Some pencils are not erasers.
II. Some erasers are not pens.
III. No pencil is cup.
IV. Some erasers are cups.

AOnly conclusion (I) and (IV) follow

BOnly conclusion (I) and (III) follow

COnly conclusion (II) and (III) follow

DOnly conclusion (II) and (IV) follow

Answer:

C. Only conclusion (II) and (III) follow

Read Explanation:

  • Let's analyze the statements and conclusions using a Venn diagram approach:

  • Statement 1: No pens are pencils. This means the "pens" and "pencils" circles are completely separate.

  • Statement 2: No eraser is cup. This means the "erasers" and "cups" circles are completely separate.

  • Statement 3: All pencils are erasers. This means the "pencils" circle is entirely inside the "erasers" circle.

  • Now, let's evaluate the conclusions:

  • Conclusion I: Some pencils are not erasers. This is false. Statement 3 says all pencils are erasers.

  • Conclusion II: Some erasers are not pens. This is true. Since all pencils are erasers, and no pencils are pens, some erasers (specifically, those that are pencils) are not pens.

  • Conclusion III: No pencil is cup. This is true. We know all pencils are erasers, and no eraser is a cup. So no pencils are cups.

  • Conclusion IV: Some erasers are cups. This is false. Statement 2 says no eraser is a cup.

  • Therefore, the conclusions that logically follow the given statements are:

  • II. Some erasers are not pens.

  • III. No pencil is cup.


Related Questions:

In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:

I. All women are hardworking.

II. All intelligent are advocate.

III. Some intelligent are women.

Conclusions:

I. Some advocates are women.

II. Some hardworking are women.

III. Some women are advocate.

IV. Some hardworking are intelligent.

Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

All wolfs are dogs.

All dogs are jackals.


Conclusions:

I. All wolfs are jackals.

II. All jackals are wolfs.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All almonds are crows. Some peanuts are razors. All razors are crows. Conclusions: (I): All peanuts are crows. (II): Some almonds are razors.

Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:
Some colleges are schools.
No ground is a college.
Conclusions:
I. No college is a ground.
II. No school is a college.
III. Some schools are colleges.

In this question, three statements are given followed by two conclusions. Choose the conclusion(s) which best fit(s) logically. Statements: 1) Some Mumbai is Delhi. 2) Some Kolkata is Mumbai. 3) Some Chennai is Delhi. Conclusions: I. All Kolkata is Chennai. II. No Chennai is Kolkata.