App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Evaluate the recommendations made by the Rangarajan Committee regarding poverty estimation in India.

  1. The Rangarajan Committee recommended a higher poverty threshold than the Tendulkar Committee.
  2. The Rangarajan Committee suggested a poverty line of Rs 47 per day for urban areas and Rs 33 per day for rural areas.
  3. The Government of India accepted and implemented the Rangarajan Committee's poverty estimates.
  4. The Rangarajan Committee was formed to review and revise the poverty estimation methods.

    Aiii, iv

    Biv

    Ci, ii, iv

    Dii, iii

    Answer:

    C. i, ii, iv

    Read Explanation:

    • The Expert Group, led by Dr. C. Rangarajan, was constituted to re-examine and update the methodology for estimating poverty in India, as the Tendulkar Committee's estimates were deemed too low for a developing economy.

    • The committee proposed significantly higher poverty lines: Rs 47 per day for urban residents and Rs 33 per day for rural residents.

    • However, these recommendations were not adopted by the government, and the Tendulkar line continued to be the official benchmark.


    Related Questions:

    Identify the technology-driven agricultural and environmental initiatives mentioned in the plan.

    1. Creating a LoRaWAN-based IoT system for crop monitoring and meteorological studies.
    2. Implementing the Kerala Food Platform for safe food with traceability.
    3. Promoting urban forestry using the Miyawaki Model.
    4. Developing traditional farming techniques without any technological integration.
      How did the area and production of coconut change in Kerala during 2023-24 compared to the previous year?
      In which year was the Niyukthi Mega Job Fair launched?
      One of the key social objectives of land reforms was to end which of the following?

      Which of the following statements accurately describe the economic condition of Kerala during the second phase of development (1976-1991)?

      1. Kerala's economy was highly developed with low poverty rates.
      2. The state experienced high incidence of poverty and unemployment.
      3. Growth rates in all sectors were higher than the national average during the 1970s and 80s.
      4. The economy remained very backward during this period.