Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following was a major criticism leveled against the Food for Work Scheme?

  1. It provided excessive wages to beneficiaries.
  2. It failed to create any public assets.
  3. It significantly failed to reduce rural unemployment.
  4. The food grains provided were of poor quality.

    Aii only

    Biii, iv

    Cii, iii

    Diii only

    Answer:

    D. iii only

    Read Explanation:

    A significant point of contention regarding the Food for Work Programme (FFW) was its effectiveness in tackling rural unemployment.

    Despite its aims, the scheme was criticized for its limited success in creating a substantial impact on the reduction of unemployment in rural areas.

    This drawback highlighted a gap between the program's objectives and its actual outcomes in terms of sustained employment generation.


    Related Questions:

    What can be inferred about the precipitation in Himalayan Dry Temperate Forests?

    1. Precipitation is generally high, exceeding 200 cm annually.
    2. The majority of precipitation occurs as rainfall throughout the year.
    3. Annual precipitation is less than 100 cm and often falls as snow.
    4. These forests are found in areas with abundant rainfall.
      The growth rate of Kerala's economy is most influenced by the performance of which sector?
      What is the total land area of Kerala?

      Which of the following statements correctly describes the government's commitment to education in Kerala?

      1. The State Government and Local Self-Government institutions are committed to providing good quality infrastructure in educational institutions.
      2. There is a strong emphasis on maintaining a hygienic environment within educational institutions by the authorities.
      3. The government's role is limited to policy-making, with infrastructure development left to private entities.
        What is a key benefit of the 'Fund of Funds' scheme for startups in Kerala?