Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads

Read the following statements and evaluate the conclusions based on traditional syllogistic logic. Consider the statements to be absolutely true, even if they appear contrary to known facts. Determine which conclusion(s) logically follow from the given statements.

Statements:

All metals are elements.

Some elements are gases.

Conclusions:

I. Some metals are gases.

II. All gases being elements is a possibility.

AOnly Conclusion Il follows

BBoth I and Il follow

COnly Conclusion I follows

DNeither I nor Il follows

Answer:

A. Only Conclusion Il follows

Read Explanation:

Let's analyze the statements using traditional syllogistic logic.

Statements:

  1. All metals are elements.

    • Metals ⊆ Elements

  2. Some elements are gases.

    • At least some elements are gases.

Conclusion I:

Some metals are gases.

  • We know all metals are elements.

  • We also know some elements are gases.

  • But there is no information connecting metals with those gaseous elements.

  • The elements that are gases may or may not be metals.

Conclusion I does not follow.

Conclusion II:

All gases being elements is a possibility.

  • We know some elements are gases, but nothing says that any gas is not an element.

  • Since there is no statement contradicting "All gases are elements," this is a valid possibility.

Conclusion II follows (possibility case).

Answer:

Only Conclusion II follows.


Related Questions:

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All doors are walls. All walls are floors. Conclusions: (I) All floors are walls. (II) Some floors are doors.
"NQRP' is related to 'TWXV" in a certain way based on the English alphabetical order. In the same way, 'FHIG' is related to 'LNOM'. To which of the following is 'LOPN' related following the same logic?

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements).

Statements:

All sharks are whales.

No whale is a dolphin.

Conclusions:

(1) No shark is a dolphin.

(Il) No dolphin is a whale.

How many meaningful four-letter English words can be formed using the first, second, third, and sixth letters of the word "PROVIDE' (when counted from left to right), using each letter only once in each word?

Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option.

Statement: Although recent advancements in quantum computina have sianificantly improved processing speeds. the stability of quantum states remains a critical barrier to developing large-scale quantum computers for practical applications

Assumptions.

1. Quantum computing holds the potential for faster data processing than classical computing.

11. Quantum states are inherently unstable, making large-scale quantum computing unfeasible

Ill. Recent advancements in quantum computing have resolved the issue of quantum state stability