Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Read the given statements) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements) is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).

Statements:

All pumpkin is mutton.

All mutton are fishes.

Conclusions:

(I) Some fishes are mutton.

(Il) All pumpkins are fishes.

AOnly conclusion (II) follows.

BNeither conclusion (1) nor (II) follows.

COnly conclusion (1) follows.

DBoth conclusions (1) and (II) follow.

Answer:

D. Both conclusions (1) and (II) follow.

Read Explanation:

Let’s analyze the statements step by step

Statements:

  1. All pumpkin is mutton → Every pumpkin belongs to mutton.

  2. All mutton are fishes → Every mutton belongs to fishes.

So the chain becomes:
Pumpkin ⊆ Mutton ⊆ Fishes

Conclusion (I): Some fishes are mutton

Since all mutton are fishes, it automatically means mutton is a subset of fishes, so at least some fishes are mutton.

Conclusion (I) follows.

Conclusion (II): All pumpkins are fishes

Since:

  • All pumpkins are mutton

  • All mutton are fishes

So pumpkins are also within fishes.

Conclusion (II) follows.

Final Answer: Both (I) and (II) follow


Related Questions:

Find the odd one out from the given alternatives:

Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option.

Statement: Despite the unpredictability of future technologies, regulatory frameworks must evolve to preempt ethical crises.

Assumptions:

I. Unregulated technological growth can cause ethical dilemmas.

Il. Ethical standards are often retrofitted to existing technology.

IlI. Regulatory systems can always accurately predict technological outcomes.

Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to beat variance with commonly known facts, and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.

Statements:

All pans are pens.

All pens are brushes.

All brushes are tables.

Conclusions:

I. Some tables are pans.

II. All pens are pans.

III. No pen is a pan.

What should come in place of the question mark (?) in the given series based on the English alphabetical order? EGC, IFG, MEK, QDO, ?
In a certain code language 'PGMS' is coded as '9-18-12-6' and 'TBRX' is coded as '5-23-7-1'. What is the code for 'KAVO' in the given language ?