Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Read the given statements) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements).

Statements:

No teacher is a male.

No male is an Engineer.

Conclusions:

I. No teacher is an Engineer.

Il. Some male are teachers.

ANeither conclusion I nor Il follows.

BBoth conclusions I and II follow.

COnly conclusion Il follows.

DOnly conclusion I follows.

Answer:

A. Neither conclusion I nor Il follows.

Read Explanation:

Let’s analyze:

Statements:

  1. No teacher is a male → (Teacher ⟶ not Male)

  2. No male is an Engineer → (Male ⟶ not Engineer)

    Conclusion I: No teacher is an Engineer

From the statements:

  • Teachers are not males

  • Only males are restricted from being engineers

But teachers could be non-males (e.g., females), and they may or may not be engineers.

Conclusion I does NOT follow

Conclusion II: Some males are teachers

This directly contradicts the first statement (No teacher is a male).

Conclusion II does NOT follow

Final Answer: Neither I nor II follows


Related Questions:

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All clocks are bulbs. All fingers are bulbs. Conclusions: (I) : No clocks are fingers. (II) : Some bulbs are clocks.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All leaves are trees. Some trees are plants. Conclusions: (l) Some leaves are plants. (Il) All leaves are trees.
Seven people A, B, C, D, E, F and G are sitting around a circular table, facing the center (but not necessarily in the same order). C is sitting to the immediate right of E. D is sitting third to the left of C. A is the immediate neighbour of B and C. F is not the immediate neighbour of E. What is the position of G with respect to A?
L, M, N, O, P, Q and R are sitting around a circular table, facing the centre (but not necessarily in the same order). Only three people are sitting between R and O when counted from the left of R. Only M is sitting between L and N. N is an immediate neighbour of O. P is sitting third to the right of L. Who is sitting second to the left of O ?
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All lifts are doors. All doors are cars. No car is a window. Conclusions: (I) : No lift is a window. (II) : Some cars are lifts