Challenger Logo

Challenger App

Get it on Google PlayGet it on App Store
Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads
Get App
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some peanuts are engines. All coats are shoes. All shoes are engines. Conclusions: (I) All coats are engines. (II) Some peanuts are coats

ABoth conclusions (I) and (II) follow.

BOnly conclusion (II) follows.

CNeither conclusion (I) nor (II) follows.

DOnly conclusion (I) follows.

Answer:

D. Only conclusion (I) follows.

Read Explanation:

Only conclusion (I) follows

Related Questions:

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All goats are trees. Some trees are cloves. Some cloves are peanuts. Conclusions: (I): Some peanuts are goats. (II): Some cloves are goats.

Direction: Two statements are followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. Assuming these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement: 
All Springs are brooks.
Some brooks are creeks.

No creek is tap.
Conclusions: 
I. Some taps are creeks.
II. No spring is tap.
III. Some brooks are springs

Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option. Statement: The discovery of exoplanets in habitable zones around distant stars has provided exciting prospects for the search for extraterrestrial life, yet the vast distances and technological limitations pose significant obstacles to direct exploration. Assumptions: I. Exoplanets located in habitable zones may have the potential to support life. Il. Current technology is insufficient to directly explore exoplanets in habitable zones. IlI. Direct exploration of exoplanets will be unnecessary if we detect signs of life remotely.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All towels are boats. No peanuts are boats. All chairs are towels. Conclusions: (I) Some boats are chairs. (II) No towels are peanuts.

Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to beat variance with commonly known facts, and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.

Statements:

All pans are pens.

All pens are brushes.

All brushes are tables.

Conclusions:

I. Some tables are pans.

II. All pens are pans.

III. No pen is a pan.