AAugust 26, 2009
BAugust 25, 2009
CAugust 24, 2009
DAugust 22, 2009
AAugust 26, 2009
BAugust 25, 2009
CAugust 24, 2009
DAugust 22, 2009
Related Questions:
Consider the following statements regarding the criticism of the constitutional amendment procedure in India:
i. There is no provision for a special body like a Constitutional Convention for amending the Constitution.
ii. The Constitution prescribes a time frame for State Legislatures to ratify or reject an amendment bill.
iii. The amendment procedure is similar to the ordinary legislative process, except for the requirement of a special majority.
iv. There is no provision for a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament to resolve deadlocks over amendment bills.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Consider the following statements on procedural aspects of amendment bills:
State legislatures can initiate amendment bills.
No joint sitting is provided for disagreements between Houses.
The bill must be passed separately in each House.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?