App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Assertion (A): The Advocate General can participate in state legislature proceedings but cannot vote.

Reason (R): The Advocate General is a member of the state legislature with limited rights to ensure separation of powers.

ABoth (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

C(A) is true, but (R) is false

D(A) is false, but (R) is true

Answer:

C. (A) is true, but (R) is false

Read Explanation:

Advocate General of a State

  • Constitutional Provision: Article 165 of the Constitution of India deals with the Advocate General for a State.

  • Appointment: The Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the State.

  • Qualifications: To be appointed as Advocate General, a person must be a citizen of India, have held a judicial office for at least ten years, or have been an advocate for at least ten years in any High Court or in two or more such courts.

  • Role in Proceedings: The Advocate General has the right to take part in the proceedings of the State Legislature (both Houses, if bicameral) and any committee thereof of which he may be named a member.

  • Right to Vote: However, the Advocate General does not have the right to vote in these proceedings, irrespective of whether the house is unicameral or bicameral.

  • Not a Member of Legislature: Crucially, the Advocate General is not a member of the State Legislature. The statement suggesting they are a member of the state legislature is incorrect.

  • Advisory Role: The Advocate General's primary role is to advise the State Government on legal matters and perform other duties of a like nature as may be referred or assigned to him by the Governor.

  • Separation of Powers Context: While the Advocate General participates in legislative proceedings to provide legal expertise, this participation is limited and does not grant them voting rights, thereby respecting the principle of separation of powers. Their role is advisory and supportive, not a part of the elected legislative body.


Related Questions:

Which of the following statements are true about the scope of the Attorney General's functions?
(i) The Attorney General's primary role is to advise the Government of India on legal matters referred by the President.
(ii) The Attorney General is prohibited from holding a brief against the Government of India.
(iii) The Attorney General must not advise any ministry or department of the Government unless the reference is channeled through the Ministry of Law and Justice.

The State Finance Commission, in the performance of its functions, has the powers of a Civil Court for which of the following matters?

  1. Summoning and enforcing the attendance of witnesses.

  2. Imposing penalties for financial mismanagement.

  3. Requiring the production of any document.

  4. Requisitioning any public record from any office.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

With reference to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), consider the following statements:

  1. The UPSC is directly created by the Constitution as an independent body.

  2. The chairman and members of the UPSC hold office for a term of six years or until they attain the age of 62 years, whichever is earlier.

  3. The expenses of the UPSC are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India and are not subject to a vote in Parliament.

  4. The UPSC is responsible for cadre management and training of All India Services officers.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Which landmark case clarified that the Doctrine of Pleasure in India is based on public policy rather than feudal or prerogative principles?

Which of the following statements are correct about Tribunals under Article 323B?

i. Article 323B empowers both Parliament and State Legislatures to establish tribunals.

ii. Tribunals under Article 323B cover disputes related to taxation, foreign exchange, and land reforms.

iii. A hierarchy of tribunals is not required under Article 323B.

iv. The Chandra Kumar case (1997) upheld the exclusion of High Court jurisdiction for Article 323B tribunals.

v. Tribunals under Article 323B can be established for disputes related to elections to Parliament and Legislative Assemblies.