Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Consider the following statements about the Advocate General's tenure and remuneration:
i. The Advocate General can resign from office by submitting a letter to the Governor.
ii. By convention, the Advocate General resigns when the state government changes.
iii. The Constitution explicitly fixes the remuneration of the Advocate General.
iv. The Governor determines the remuneration of the Advocate General.

AOnly i and ii are correct

BOnly iii and iv are correct

COnly i, ii, and iv are correct

DAll statements are correct

Answer:

C. Only i, ii, and iv are correct

Read Explanation:

Advocate General of the State: Tenure and Remuneration

  • Appointment: The Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the respective state.

  • Qualifications: Must be a citizen of India, should have held a judicial office for not less than 10 years, or should have been an advocate for 10 years in any High Court or in two or more such courts.

  • Term of Office: The Constitution does not specify a fixed term for the Advocate General.

  • Resignation:

    • Statement (i) is correct: The Advocate General can resign from their post by submitting a resignation letter to the Governor.

    • Statement (ii) is correct: By convention, it is expected that the Advocate General will resign upon the change of the state government. This ensures alignment with the new executive leadership.

  • Remuneration:

    • Statement (iii) is incorrect: The Constitution of India does not explicitly fix the remuneration of the Advocate General.

    • Statement (iv) is correct: The remuneration of the Advocate General is determined by the Governor. This amount is subject to the discretion of the Governor, although it is often based on the scale of pay for High Court Judges.

  • Powers and Functions: The Advocate General has the right to speak and to take part in the proceedings of the State Legislature, but without a right to vote. They also have certain duties related to the government.

  • Constitutional Basis: Article 165 of the Constitution of India deals with the Advocate General for the State.


Related Questions:

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding the State Finance Commission.

i) It is constituted under Article 243-I and Article 243-Y of the Indian Constitution.

ii) The State Finance Commission can have a maximum of five members, including the Chairman.

iii) The Commission has the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

iv) The State Finance Commission submits its report directly to the State Legislative Assembly.

Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the qualifications of the Attorney General of India?

i. The Attorney General must be an Indian citizen.

ii. The Attorney General must have been a High Court judge for at least 5 years or an advocate in a High Court for 10 years, or an eminent jurist as per the President's opinion.

iii. The Attorney General must have served as a Supreme Court judge for at least 3 years.

Consider the following statements about the CAG’s independence and functioning:

(i) The CAG does not hold office at the pleasure of the President, though appointed by him/her.

(ii) The administrative expenses of the CAG’s office are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India.

(iii) The CAG can demand details of secret service expenditure from executive agencies.

(iv) The CAG acts as a guide, friend, and philosopher to the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament.

Which of these statement(s) is/are correct?

With reference to the State Services, consider the following statements:

  1. The officers of State Services are selected by the respective State Public Service Commissions.

  2. The Chief Secretary heads the civil service administration in each state.

  3. State Services are classified into Group A, Group B, Group C, and Group D, similar to Central Services.

  4. The All India Services Act, 1951 mandates that at least 50% of senior posts in All India Services be filled by promotion from State Services.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Which of the following statements is/are correct about Tribunals under Articles 323A and 323B?

i. Tribunals under Article 323A can only be established by the Parliament.

ii. Tribunals under Article 323B can be established by both Parliament and State Legislatures.

iii. A hierarchy of tribunals is mandatory under Article 323A.

iv. Article 323B covers disputes related to taxation, land reforms, and elections.

v. The Chandra Kumar case (1997) upheld the exclusion of High Court jurisdiction for tribunals under both Articles 323A and 323B.