App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Consider the following statements regarding the distribution of legislative subjects.

(i) The Union List has precedence over both the State List and the Concurrent List in case of a conflict.
(ii) The state legislature has exclusive power to legislate on any matter in the State List, except in Union Territories.
(iii) The Concurrent List originally contained 52 subjects, which has now been reduced to 47 subjects.

A(i) and (ii) only

B(ii) and (iii) only

C(i) and (iii) only

DAll of the above

Answer:

A. (i) and (ii) only

Read Explanation:

Understanding Legislative Subject Distribution in India

  • The Indian Constitution, through its Seventh Schedule, distributes legislative powers between the Union (Central) Government and the State Governments. This distribution is categorized into three lists: the Union List (List I), the State List (List II), and the Concurrent List (List III).
  • This scheme of distribution is fundamental to India's federal structure, ensuring a clear division of responsibilities while allowing for cooperation.

Union List (List I)

  • The Union List comprises subjects on which the Parliament has exclusive power to make laws. These are typically matters of national importance.
  • Examples include defence, foreign affairs, railways, banking, currency, atomic energy, and communication.
  • There are currently 98 subjects (originally 97) in the Union List.
  • In case of a conflict or overlapping interpretation between a subject in the Union List and another list, the Union List generally holds precedence. This principle, often derived from Article 246 and the doctrine of 'pith and substance', reinforces the supremacy of parliamentary legislation on matters of national importance.

State List (List II)

  • The State List consists of subjects on which the State Legislatures have exclusive power to make laws. These relate to local and regional interests.
  • Examples include public order, police, public health and sanitation, agriculture, local government, and prisons.
  • There are currently 59 subjects (originally 66) in the State List.
  • While State Legislatures generally have exclusive power over these subjects, this exclusivity does not extend to Union Territories. For Union Territories, Parliament retains the power to legislate on any subject, including those in the State List, as outlined in Article 239. Even if a Union Territory has its own legislature (like Delhi or Puducherry), Parliament's laws on State List subjects will prevail.

Concurrent List (List III)

  • The Concurrent List includes subjects on which both the Parliament and the State Legislatures can make laws.
  • Examples include criminal law, civil procedure, marriage and divorce, factories, trade unions, electricity, and economic and social planning.
  • Originally, the Concurrent List contained 47 subjects.
  • The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976, often referred to as the 'Mini Constitution', transferred five subjects from the State List to the Concurrent List. These five subjects are:
    • Education
    • Forests
    • Weights and Measures (except establishment of standards)
    • Protection of Wild Animals and Birds
    • Administration of Justice; Constitution and organisation of all courts, except the Supreme Court and the High Courts
  • After this amendment, the Concurrent List now contains 52 subjects.
  • In case of a conflict or repugnancy between a Central law and a State law on a subject in the Concurrent List, the Central law generally prevails as per Article 254. However, if a State law on a Concurrent List subject has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, it will prevail in that particular State, though Parliament can still subsequently legislate on the same matter to override it.

Related Questions:

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding Administrative Relations between the Centre and States.

(i) The Centre can issue directions to states for the construction and maintenance of communication means declared to be of national or military importance.
(ii) The Centre’s directions to states under Article 256 are enforceable only through persuasion, not coercion.
(iii) The states are obligated to provide adequate facilities for mother-tongue instruction at the primary stage for linguistic minority groups.

Consider the following statements regarding Administrative Relations.

(i) The President can establish an Inter-State Council to discuss matters of common interest between the Centre and states.
(ii) The mutual delegation of executive functions can occur only through an agreement between the Centre and states.
(iii) The Centre’s directions to states for the welfare of Scheduled Tribes are enforceable under Article 365.

Match the following legislative provisions with their corresponding articles or contexts in the Indian Constitution.

i. Residuary powers of legislation
ii. Parliamentary legislation during a national emergency
iii. Centre’s control over state legislation through President’s assent
iv. Legislation for implementing international agreements

a. Article 248
b. Article 253
c. Articles 200 and 201
d. Article 250

With reference to the Centre’s control over state legislation, consider the following statements:

  1. The Governor can reserve any state bill for the President’s consideration, who holds an absolute veto over it.

  2. A state bill restricting freedom of trade and commerce requires prior presidential permission under Article 304.

  3. During a financial emergency, all state bills must be reserved for the President’s consideration.

  4. The Centre can issue directions to states to ensure compliance with parliamentary laws under Article 365.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Which of the following statements are correct regarding the Punchhi Commission’s recommendations?
(i) Governors should be given a fixed tenure of five years, and their removal should not be at the Centre’s discretion.
(ii) The Inter-State Council should have a continuing auditing role in matters of concurrent jurisdiction.
(iii) The All-India Services should be abolished to enhance state autonomy.