ADoctrine of Repugnancy
BDoctrine of Pith and Substance
CDoctrine of Territorial Nexus
DDoctrine of Federal Supremacy
ADoctrine of Repugnancy
BDoctrine of Pith and Substance
CDoctrine of Territorial Nexus
DDoctrine of Federal Supremacy
Related Questions:
Consider the following statements with regard to Article 311 of the Constitution of India:
(i) Article 311 imposes restrictions on the arbitrary dismissal of civil servants by requiring a reasonable opportunity for a hearing.
(ii) Article 311 applies to all civil servants, including members of the Defence Forces and secretarial staff of Parliament.
(iii) The restrictions under Article 311 control the exercise of the Doctrine of Pleasure by the President or Governor.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
What is/are the major feature(s) of the Chandra Kumar case (1997)?
(i) It declared the exclusion of High Court jurisdiction over CAT orders unconstitutional.
(ii) It established that appeals against CAT orders must be made to the division bench of the concerned High Court.
(iii) It upheld the complete exclusion of Supreme Court jurisdiction over tribunal orders.
Which of the following statements are correct regarding parliamentary legislation in the state field?
(i) Under Article 249, a resolution passed by the Rajya Sabha remains in force for one year and can be renewed multiple times.
(ii) Under Article 252, a law passed by Parliament applies only to states that have consented, but other states can adopt it later.
(iii) During President’s rule, laws made by Parliament on State List subjects cease to operate once the President’s rule ends.