Question

The curriculum is criticized for having a 'Lack of Practical Focus' because it stresses...

• A. communication skills more than literature and theory.
• B. literature and theory more than communication skills.
• C. speaking and listening over reading and writing.
• D. practical application over grammatical accuracy.

Answer 1

Answer:

B. literature and theory more than communication skills.

Criticism of Educational Curricula: Lack of Practical Focus

• Curriculum Imbalance: A common criticism leveled against certain educational curricula is an overemphasis on theoretical knowledge at the expense of practical application. This can be particularly true in subjects like English Literature.
• Focus on Literature and Theory: Curricula criticized for a 'lack of practical focus' often dedicate significant time and resources to the study of literary works, literary criticism, and theoretical frameworks. This might include in-depth analysis of texts, historical contexts of literature, and various literary theories (e.g., structuralism, post-structuralism, feminism).
• Neglect of Communication Skills: Conversely, these curricula may underemphasize the development of essential communication skills. These skills are crucial for effective interaction in personal, academic, and professional settings and include aspects like public speaking, professional writing (e.g., reports, business correspondence), interpersonal communication, and active listening.
• Impact on Employability: For students preparing for competitive exams and subsequent careers, this imbalance can be detrimental. Employers often seek candidates with strong communication abilities, which are directly applicable to job roles. A curriculum heavy on theory might not adequately equip students with these marketable skills.
• Exam Relevance: In competitive exams, questions often test not only theoretical knowledge but also the ability to apply that knowledge. A 'lack of practical focus' in the curriculum might mean students are less prepared for application-based questions or scenarios that require practical communication strategies.
• Pedagogical Implications: Educators might face challenges in demonstrating the real-world relevance of literature when the curriculum prioritizes abstract analysis over skill-building. This can lead to student disengagement if they perceive the subject matter as detached from their future needs.
• Need for Balance: Effective curricula aim to strike a balance between theoretical understanding and practical skill development. This ensures that students gain a comprehensive education that prepares them for both advanced study and the demands of the professional world.