Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads
The passage says that Greenhouse gases are

Read the following passage and answer the questions by choosing the correct option (81-83). The Kyoto Protocol, which came into force on 16 February 2005, was one of the first initiatives for following the course of eco-friendly development on a global scale. Under the protocol, thirty-seven industrialized nations (called Annexure I countries) committed themselves to a reduction of the four greenhouse gases- Carbon dioxide, Methane, Sulphur hexafluorides and Nitrous oxide-and the two groups-Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons-produced. All the other member nations (including India) were to give a general commitment, though not as rigorous as the one given by the industrialized nations. The Annexure I countries agreed to reduce their collective emissions by 5.2 percent from the 1990 level. The Kyoto Protocol was signed by 187 countries on November 2009. India is a member of the treaty while the United States has a status of 'signed but not intending to ratify' the treaty.

AHarmful to life

BEssential for life

CTo be produced by Annexure I countries

DNecessary for eco-friendly development

Answer:

A. Harmful to life


Related Questions:

When she learned that she could not attend the university in Warsaw, she was..................
Even though she became fatally ill from working with radium, Marie Curie was never ..................
A synonym for the word "anguish" is:
Identify the sentence which uses the correct form of the adjective for comparison in the context of the given passage.

From a broader viewpoint, what claim does the author make about hard work and smart work?

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage:

In the tireless pursuit of achievement, the contrast between hard work and smart work appears not simply as a preference but as a subtle interplay within human productivity. Hard work-linked with sustained effort, unwavering perseverance, and sheer diligence-has long been praised as the foundation of accomplishment. Stories and biographies often glorify the individual who relies on grit and time to reach goals. Yet in a world shaped by precision tools, automation, and mental efficiency, these older assumptions are increasingly questioned. By contrast, smart work emphasizes strategic deployment of effort-using reflection, optimal resource use, and careful situational judgment. It attempts to reduce waste in labour while boosting returns on both thought and action. Smart workers examine systems, identify bottlenecks, and exploit tools-digital platforms or networks-to accelerate results. They step off the treadmill of one-direction exertion by embedding intelligence into execution.

Still, praising smart work alone creates its own weakness. Intelligence without discipline often ends in shallowness-a surface-level capability that collapses under prolonged pressure. In the same way, relentless hard work without strategic course-correction can cause exhaustion and low effectiveness. Thus, modern success demands a blend: the wise worker mixes determination with strategy, working not only harder but better. The contrast is therefore not an either-or divide but a complementary relationship. Treating either extreme as ideal ignores the complex realities of performance. In today's demanding landscape, the combined force of persistence and precision makes outcomes sustainable and impact stronger. Success, ultimately, is not produced by blind toil or cleverness alone, but by intelligent perseverance.