App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
What does Arnold critique Robert Burns for?

ALack of poetic skill.

BLack of intellectual depth.

CLack of emotional sincerity.

DLack of technical refinement.

Answer:

B. Lack of intellectual depth.

Read Explanation:

Robert Burns:

  • He acknowledges Burns’s emotional intensity but criticizes his lack of intellectual depth.

  • Robert Burns in the late eighteenth century and says that this is the period from which the personal estimate begins to affect the real estimate.

  • Burns, according to Arnold, is a better poet in Scottish than in English.

  • Like Chaucer Arnold does not consider Burns to be a classic.

  • He says that Burns too lacks the high seriousness desired of poetry.

  • He compares Burns to Chaucer and finds that Burns‟ manner of presentation is deeper than that of Chaucer.

  • According to the real estimate Burns lacks the high seriousness of the classics but his poetry nevertheless has truthful substance and style.


Related Questions:

In which century did Ānandavardhana live?
The best tragedies, Aristotle argues, have:
How does Aristotle view the emotional effect of tragedy?
Eliot’s idea of “impersonal theory of poetry” implies:
What was Eliot’s first published poem?