Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads
What is the irony mentioned in the passage?

Old age is quite similar to childhood in many respects. The way a child is unable to do any work on his own and is dependent on his parents every now and then, old people are also dependent on others for getting their work accomplished as they are no longer physically fit. But here lies the irony. These old people are the same who took care of their children when they were small. They never considered their children as a burden. But the same children when they grow up find it difficult to take care of their old parents. When their parents become old the children start finding out ways to get rid of them so that they can enjoy their life in peace.

AParents considered their children as a burden when they were small

BThe children who were taken care of by their parents find it difficult to take care of their parents in their old age

CAll the children are happy to look after their parents

DParents do not want to be taken care of by their children

Answer:

B. The children who were taken care of by their parents find it difficult to take care of their parents in their old age

Read Explanation:

The irony highlighted in the passage is that parents, who once cared for their children without considering them a burden, often find themselves in old age being cared for by their children, who may find it difficult or burdensome to reciprocate the care. This reversal of roles is the ironic situation described.


Related Questions:

Choose the option which is the antonym of the word "EGOISM".
Sneha's declaration that she wanted to be a wildlife photographer made her parents
What does word 'testament' mean?
Which option best explains the “dialectical” character of art mentioned in the passage? Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage:

Which of the following best describes the author's tone in the passage?

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage:

In the tireless pursuit of achievement, the contrast between hard work and smart work appears not simply as a preference but as a subtle interplay within human productivity. Hard work-linked with sustained effort, unwavering perseverance, and sheer diligence-has long been praised as the foundation of accomplishment. Stories and biographies often glorify the individual who relies on grit and time to reach goals. Yet in a world shaped by precision tools, automation, and mental efficiency, these older assumptions are increasingly questioned. By contrast, smart work emphasizes strategic deployment of effort-using reflection, optimal resource use, and careful situational judgment. It attempts to reduce waste in labour while boosting returns on both thought and action. Smart workers examine systems, identify bottlenecks, and exploit tools-digital platforms or networks-to accelerate results. They step off the treadmill of one-direction exertion by embedding intelligence into execution.

Still, praising smart work alone creates its own weakness. Intelligence without discipline often ends in shallowness-a surface-level capability that collapses under prolonged pressure. In the same way, relentless hard work without strategic course-correction can cause exhaustion and low effectiveness. Thus, modern success demands a blend: the wise worker mixes determination with strategy, working not only harder but better. The contrast is therefore not an either-or divide but a complementary relationship. Treating either extreme as ideal ignores the complex realities of performance. In today's demanding landscape, the combined force of persistence and precision makes outcomes sustainable and impact stronger. Success, ultimately, is not produced by blind toil or cleverness alone, but by intelligent perseverance.