The "Touchstone Method" introduced by Matthew Arnold is a literary criticism technique where a critic compares passages from a work being analyzed to short, well-regarded excerpts from established literary masters like Homer, Shakespeare, and Milton, using these "touchstones" to gauge the quality of the work being assessed; essentially, judging a poem's merit by comparing it to recognized classics to determine its true artistic value.
Key points about the Touchstone Method:
Objective evaluation:
Arnold believed this method allowed for a more objective analysis of a work, reducing the influence of personal taste or historical context alone.
"Touchstones" as reference points:
The selected passages from great works act as "touchstones" against which other works can be measured.
Critic's role:
The critic is expected to identify similar qualities of emotion, depth, and expression between the "touchstone" passages and the work under analysis.
Criticisms of the Touchstone Method:
Oversimplification:
Some critics argue that judging a whole work based on a few short excerpts can be reductive and may not capture the full complexity of a piece.
Subjectivity in selection:
Choosing which passages to use as "touchstones" can still be subjective, potentially influencing the outcome of the analysis.