App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
Whenever there is inconsistency or repugnancy exists between the provisions of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act and the Industrial Disputes Act, which one of the following hold true?

AKCS Act will Prevail over ID Act

BID Act Prevail Over KCS Act

CEither ID Act or KCS Act as per decision of Court

DEither KCS Act or ID Act as per decision of Government

Answer:

B. ID Act Prevail Over KCS Act

Read Explanation:

An Act to consolidate, amend and unify the laws relating to Co-operative Societies in the State of Kerala. Preamble. HEREAS with a view to provide for the orderly development of the Co-operative sector. the State, by organizing the Co-operative societies as self governing democratic.


Related Questions:

With respect to nature, powers and functions of Cooperative Arbitration Tribunal, which of the following statements is/are inappropriate? I. CAT is a forum subordinate to the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. II. CAT exercises same powers as that of Civil Court. III. CAT has power to consider the request of the delinquent for payment of allowance, pending enquiry. IV. The CAT shall have jurisdiction to hear appeals against decision of the registrar or an arbitrator.
Which of the following combination of nature of dispute and authority to whom it shall be referred is correct? I. Nature of Dispute and Authority Non-Monetary Dispute between Society and Creditor of Society- Cooperative Arbitration Court II. Non-Monetary Dispute between Society and Creditor of Society-Registrar III.Monetary Dispute between Society and Creditor of Society-Cooperative Arbitration Court IV.Monetary Dispute between Society and Creditor of Society-Registrar Combinations
Payment of the trade creditors would:
Which of the following ratios indicates the short term solvency of the firm
The following statements are related to duties, powers of Registrar related to settlement of disputes. Identify the statement(s) inappropriate as per provisions of Kerala Cooperative Societies Act. I. Registrar appointed as Arbitrator has no right to use word court in his proceedings and have jurisdiction to decide monitory disputes only. II.The Registrar or any person conferred with the powers of registrar is only a Quasi- Judicial authority and not a court. III. Monitory disputes relating to service matters are not to be adjudicated by Registrar. IV. The dispute in connection with employment of officers and their promotion and interse seniority are to be adjudicated by Registrar. V. The Registrar has the power to adjudicate upon the service disputes in a society.