Question

Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the 'non-interface position' in Krashen's theory?

• A. A. A learner uses conscious grammar rules to correct their speech, but this knowledge doesn't automatically become fluent language.
• B. B. A student masters grammar through drills and then spontaneously uses it in conversation.
• C. C. A child learns vocabulary words and uses them immediately in sentences.
• D. D. A teacher explains a grammar point, and students instantly understand and apply it.

Answer 1

Answer:

A. A. A learner uses conscious grammar rules to correct their speech, but this knowledge doesn't automatically become fluent language.

Krashen’s Non-Interface Position (a key part of his theories) claims that:

• Language acquisition (subconscious, intuitive learning) and

• Language learning (conscious study of grammar and rules)
  are separate processes and do not convert into each other.

💡 So, what does the Non-Interface Position say?

• You cannot convert consciously learned grammar into fluent, automatic language use.

• Only comprehensible input leads to true acquisition.

✅ Best Illustration:

A learner starts using the past tense correctly after months of reading and listening to stories in English, even though they were never formally taught past tense rules.

This shows that the learner:

• Acquired the structure naturally (not learned it through rules)

• Reflects Krashen’s belief that fluency results from acquisition, not from grammar drills