Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements about the Attorney General's rights within the Indian Parliament are correct?
i. The Attorney General has the right to speak in the proceedings of both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
ii. As the highest law officer, the Attorney General is granted the right to vote during a joint sitting of Parliament.
iii. The Attorney General can be named a member of any parliamentary committee and has the right to participate in its proceedings.

AOnly i and ii

BOnly i and iii

COnly ii and iii

DAll of the above (i, ii and iii)

Answer:

B. Only i and iii

Read Explanation:

Attorney General of India in Relation to Parliamentary Proceedings

  • Right to Speak: The Attorney General of India has the right to participate in discussions and speak in the proceedings of both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, as well as in any joint sitting of the Parliament. This is enshrined in Article 88 of the Constitution.

  • Not a Member: However, the Attorney General is not a member of either House of Parliament. Therefore, the Attorney General does not have the right to vote in parliamentary proceedings. This is a crucial distinction in competitive exams.

  • Committee Participation: The Attorney General can be appointed to parliamentary committees. In such a capacity, the Attorney General has the right to participate in the committee's proceedings and offer legal expertise.

  • Constitutional Provisions: Article 76 of the Constitution of India deals with the Office of the Attorney General for India. Article 88 specifically deals with the rights of the Attorney General in relation to Parliament.

  • Distinction from Elected Members: It's important to differentiate the Attorney General's role from that of elected Members of Parliament (MPs). While MPs have the right to vote and represent constituencies, the Attorney General's role is advisory and legal, based on constitutional appointment.


Related Questions:

Which of the following statement(s) about the Advocate General's qualifications and tenure is/are accurate?
i. A person is qualified to be Advocate General if they have been a judicial officer for 10 years or an advocate of a High Court for 10 years.
ii. The Constitution does not fix the Advocate General's term of office.
iii. The Governor determines the Advocate General's remuneration.
iv. The Advocate General must resign when the Chief Minister changes, as per constitutional mandate.

Consider the following statements about the Advocate General's tenure and remuneration:
i. The Advocate General can resign from office by submitting a letter to the Governor.
ii. By convention, the Advocate General resigns when the state government changes.
iii. The Constitution explicitly fixes the remuneration of the Advocate General.
iv. The Governor determines the remuneration of the Advocate General.

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding the composition and tenure of the State Finance Commission.

i) Members of the State Finance Commission are appointed by the Governor and are eligible for reappointment.

ii) The Commission must include at least one member with experience in local administration.

iii) The Chairman of the State Finance Commission must be a retired judge of the High Court.

iv) A member’s resignation is effective only after acceptance by the Governor.

പീപ്പിൾസ് കോർട്ട് എന്നറിയപ്പെടുന്നത് ഏത് ?

Consider the following statements regarding the removal and remuneration of the Attorney General.

  1. The Constitution lays down the specific grounds of 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity' for the removal of the Attorney General.

  2. The Attorney General holds office based on the 'doctrine of pleasure', meaning they can be removed by the President at any time without cause.

  3. The salary and allowances of the Attorney General are determined by an act of Parliament.

Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?