Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements about the CAG’s independence is/are not correct?
i. The CAG’s salary and service conditions can be altered to his/her disadvantage after appointment.
ii. The CAG is eligible for further office under the Government of India after ceasing to hold office.
iii. The administrative expenses of the CAG’s office are subject to the vote of Parliament.

Ai only

Bi and ii only

Ci, ii, and iii

Dii and iii only

Answer:

C. i, ii, and iii

Read Explanation:

Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) - Independence

  • Article 148 of the Indian Constitution provides for the appointment of the CAG.
  • The CAG is an independent constitutional authority.
  • Security of Tenure:
    • The CAG holds office for a term of 6 years or until the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.
    • The CAG can be removed from office only in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court.
    • Key Point for Exams: The salary and service conditions of the CAG cannot be altered to his/her disadvantage after his/her appointment. This ensures financial independence and protection from arbitrary executive action.
  • Post-Retirement Conditions:
    • The CAG is not eligible for further office under the Government of India or any State Government after ceasing to hold office. This prevents potential conflicts of interest and ensures impartial auditing.
    • Key Point for Exams: This restriction is crucial for maintaining the CAG's integrity and preventing any undue influence or post-retirement benefits from compromising their audit function.
  • Administrative Expenses:
    • The administrative expenses of the CAG's office, including salaries, salaries of persons serving in connection with the affairs of the office of the CAG and pensions payable to or in respect of such persons, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
    • Key Point for Exams: These expenses are not subject to the vote of Parliament. This 'non-votable' status ensures that the CAG's office is not dependent on the annual budgetary approval by the legislature, thereby safeguarding its independence.
  • The independence of the CAG is vital for ensuring accountability of the executive to the Parliament regarding public expenditure.

Related Questions:

Consider the following statements regarding Article 311 of the Indian Constitution:

  1. Article 311(1) ensures that a civil servant cannot be dismissed by an authority subordinate to the one that appointed them.

  2. Article 311(2) mandates an inquiry before dismissal, removal, or reduction in rank, except in cases of criminal conviction or state security concerns.

  3. The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 provided for a second opportunity for civil servants to make representations against proposed punishments.
    Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?

Consider the following statements regarding the initiation of a constitutional amendment bill under Article 368:

  1. The bill can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and not in the Rajya Sabha.

  2. Prior permission of the President is required for introducing the bill.

  3. The bill can be introduced by a private member without ministerial involvement.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

With reference to the role of Zonal Councils, consider the following statements:

  1. They are deliberative and advisory bodies.

  2. Decisions of Zonal Councils are binding on the member states.

  3. The councils facilitate coordination on issues like river systems and communication.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

Consider the following statements about the Advocate General:

(i) The Advocate General advises the state government on legal matters referred by the Governor.

(ii) The Advocate General must be a citizen of India and qualified to be a High Court judge.

(iii) The Advocate General’s removal process is detailed in Article 177 of the Constitution.

(iv) The Advocate General enjoys voting rights in the state legislature.

Which of these statement(s) is/are correct?

Which of the following statements are correct about the Chandra Kumar case (1997)?

i. It declared the exclusion of High Court jurisdiction under Articles 323A and 323B unconstitutional.

ii. It allowed appeals against CAT orders to be made to the Division Bench of the concerned High Court.

iii. It upheld the restriction that appeals against CAT orders could only be made to the Supreme Court.

iv. It emphasized that judicial review is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.

v. It ruled that SATs cannot exercise original jurisdiction over state government employees.