Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements about the Punchhi Commission are correct?

  1. It recommended fixed five-year tenures for governors.

  2. It proposed guidelines for the governor’s role in case of a hung assembly.

  3. It recommended that governors should continue as chancellors of universities.

A1 and 2 only

B2 and 3 only

C1 and 3 only

DAll are correct

Answer:

A. 1 and 2 only

Read Explanation:

Punchhi Commission: Key Facts and Recommendations

  • The Punchhi Commission on Centre-State Relations was constituted by the Government of India in 2007.
  • It was chaired by Justice Madan Mohan Punchhi, a former Chief Justice of India. The Commission submitted its report in 2010.
  • Its primary mandate was to examine and review the working of the existing arrangements between the Union and States and recommend changes to address contemporary challenges.

Recommendations related to Governors:

  • The Commission recommended a fixed five-year tenure for Governors. It suggested that the 'doctrine of pleasure' should be removed from the Constitution, and Governors should be removed only by a resolution of the State Legislature, similar to the President's impeachment process.
  • It proposed clear guidelines for the Governor's role in the event of a hung assembly (where no single party or pre-poll alliance achieves a clear majority). The guidelines suggested inviting the leader of the single largest pre-poll alliance first, or the single largest party if no pre-poll alliance exists, to form the government and prove their majority on the floor of the House within a reasonable time.
  • Contrary to one of the statements, the Punchhi Commission recommended that Governors should not continue as Chancellors of universities. It suggested that this role should be separated from the office of Governor to reduce potential for political interference and allow the Governor to focus solely on constitutional duties. This aims to depoliticize the university administration.

Other Significant Recommendations:

  • The Commission reiterated that Article 356 (President's Rule) should be used only as a last resort, aligning with the Supreme Court's pronouncements in the S.R. Bommai case (1994).
  • It recommended that the Centre should consult states before formulating treaties with foreign countries that might affect state interests.
  • The Commission also suggested exploring possibilities of sharing mineral revenue with states and allowing states to levy taxes on certain services to improve their financial autonomy.

Related Questions:

Consider the following:

Statement: The Governor of Assam can direct that an act of Parliament does not apply to tribal areas in the state.
Assertion: This power is exclusive to the Governor of Assam and not shared with the President.

Which of the following is correct?

Consider the following statements regarding the jurisdiction and functioning of Tribunals:

  1. The Central Administrative Tribunal has jurisdiction over civilian posts under the Defence Services but not over members of the Defence Forces.

  2. State Administrative Tribunals (SATs) are established by the Central Government on the request of State Governments.

  3. Tribunals under Article 323B can adjudicate disputes related to rent and tenancy rights.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

What is the trigger for Parliament’s power to legislate on the State List under Article 250?

What is/are the major feature(s) of the Chandra Kumar case (1997)?

(i) It declared the exclusion of High Court jurisdiction over CAT orders unconstitutional.
(ii) It established that appeals against CAT orders must be made to the division bench of the concerned High Court.
(iii) It upheld the complete exclusion of Supreme Court jurisdiction over tribunal orders.

Consider the following statements with regard to Administrative Tribunals:

(i) The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, empowers the Central Government to establish State Administrative Tribunals at the request of State Governments.
(ii) The post of Vice-Chairman in the Central Administrative Tribunal was removed by the Administrative Tribunals Amendment Act, 2006.
(iii) The Central Administrative Tribunal is bound by the procedures laid down in the Civil Procedure Code of 1908.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?