Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements are correct about the appointment and tenure of the Attorney General?
(i) The Attorney General is appointed by the President based on the advice of the outgoing Attorney General.
(ii) The Constitution provides a fixed five-year tenure for the Attorney General to ensure his independence.
(iii) Conventionally, the Attorney General resigns when the government he/she was appointed to advise is replaced.

AOnly (i) and (ii)

BOnly (ii) and (iii)

COnly (iii)

DAll of the above (i, ii and iii)

Answer:

C. Only (iii)

Read Explanation:

Attorney General of India: Appointment and Tenure

  • Constitutional Basis: Article 76 of the Constitution of India deals with the office of the Attorney General (AG).

  • Appointment: The President of India appoints the Attorney General. There is no specific recommendation or advice mandated by the Constitution for this appointment. The President appoints the person who is qualified to be a judge of the Supreme Court.

  • Qualifications: A person shall not be appointed as Attorney General unless he is a citizen of India and has for at least 10 years held a judicial office in the territory of India or for at least 10 years been an advocate of a High Court or two or more such courts in succession.

  • Tenure: The Constitution does not specify a fixed tenure for the Attorney General. The AG holds office during the pleasure of the President. This means the President can remove the AG at any time.

  • Resignation: Although there is no fixed tenure, it is a convention that the Attorney General resigns when the government that appointed him/her resigns or is replaced. This ensures that the AG remains an advisor to the incumbent government and maintains political neutrality.

  • Independence: The absence of a fixed tenure and the power of the President to remove the AG at pleasure, unlike a fixed tenure for judges, does raise questions about the complete independence of the office. However, the convention of resignation upon government change helps in maintaining a degree of professional integrity.

  • Role: The Attorney General is the highest law officer in India. He advises the Government of India on legal matters and performs other legal duties assigned by the President. He also represents the government in all court cases in which the Government of India is concerned.


Related Questions:

Which of the following statements about the CAG is/are not correct?
i. The CAG is considered one of the bulwarks of the democratic system, alongside the Supreme Court, Election Commission, and UPSC.
ii. The CAG’s salary is equivalent to that of the Chief Justice of India.
iii. The CAG submits audit reports on state accounts to the President of India.

Which of the following statements regarding the CAG’s audit reports is/are correct?
i. The CAG submits three audit reports: appropriation accounts, finance accounts, and public undertakings.
ii. The CAG’s audit reports on state accounts are submitted to the President, who presents them to the state legislature.
iii. The Public Accounts Committee examines the CAG’s appropriation and finance audit reports, while the Committee on Public Undertakings examines the public undertakings report.
iv. No minister can represent the CAG in Parliament for the audit reports.

Evaluate the following statements about the removal and resignation of the Advocate General:

  1. The Constitution does not specify a removal procedure for the Advocate General.

  2. The Advocate General can be removed by a simple majority vote in the State Legislative Assembly.

  3. Resignation is effected by submitting a letter to the Speaker of the State Legislative Assembly.

  4. The "pleasure of the Governor" clause means the Governor can remove the Advocate General at any time.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Consider the following statements about the CAG’s duties:

(i) The CAG audits all expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India and each state.

(ii) The CAG compiles and maintains the accounts of the Central Government.

(iii) The CAG submits audit reports on public undertakings to the Prime Minister.

Which of the statement(s) is/are NOT TRUE?

Which of the following statements are correct about the Chandra Kumar case (1997)?

i. It declared the exclusion of High Court jurisdiction under Articles 323A and 323B unconstitutional.

ii. It allowed appeals against CAT orders to be made to the Division Bench of the concerned High Court.

iii. It upheld the restriction that appeals against CAT orders could only be made to the Supreme Court.

iv. It emphasized that judicial review is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.

v. It ruled that SATs cannot exercise original jurisdiction over state government employees.