Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements correctly describe the term and removal of the Advocate General?

  1. The Constitution fixes the term of office for the Advocate General as five years.

  2. The Constitution provides a specific procedure for the removal of the Advocate General.

  3. The Advocate General holds office at the pleasure of the Governor.

  4. The Advocate General can be removed by the President of India on the advice of the Governor.

How many of the above statements are correct?

AOnly one

BOnly two

COnly three

DAll four

Answer:

A. Only one

Read Explanation:

Advocate General for the State: Key Provisions and Removal

  • Constitutional Ambit: Article 165 of the Constitution of India deals with the Advocate General for the State.

  • Appointment: The Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the respective state.

  • Qualifications: To be appointed as Advocate General, an individual must be a citizen of India and should have held a judicial office in India for not less than ten years or be an advocate in any High Court for not less than ten years.

  • Term of Office: The Constitution does not specify a fixed term for the Advocate General. They hold office during the pleasure of the Governor.

  • Removal: Similarly, there is no specific procedure for the removal of the Advocate General laid down in the Constitution. The Governor can remove the Advocate General at any time, without assigning any reason, as the office is held 'at the pleasure of the Governor'.

  • Independence: While appointed by the Governor, the Advocate General functions as the chief legal advisor to the state government.

  • Distinction from Attorney General: The Attorney General for India (Article 76) holds office during the pleasure of the President and has qualifications similar to a Supreme Court judge.

Analysis of the Statements:

  • Statement 1 is incorrect because the Constitution does not fix a five-year term for the Advocate General.

  • Statement 2 is incorrect because the Constitution does not provide a specific removal procedure for the Advocate General.

  • Statement 3 is correct as the Advocate General holds office at the pleasure of the Governor.

  • Statement 4 is incorrect because the Advocate General is removed by the Governor, not the President, and there's no requirement for the Governor's advice in such a presidential removal.

Therefore, only one statement (Statement 3) is correct.


Related Questions:

Which of the following is/are correct regarding the composition of Zonal Councils?

i. Each Zonal Council includes the Chief Ministers of all states in the zone and two other ministers from each state.

ii. The Chief Secretary of each state in the zone has voting rights in the Zonal Council meetings.

iii. Administrators of Union Territories in the zone are members of the respective Zonal Council.

Which of the following statements are not associated with the Advocate General’s qualifications?

i. The Advocate General must be a citizen of India.

ii. The Advocate General must have been an advocate for 15 years in a High Court.

iii. The Advocate General must be a resident of the state they serve.

iv. The Advocate General must have held a judicial office for 10 years as an alternative qualification.

തെറ്റായ പ്രസ്താവന കണ്ടെത്തുക :
വാദികളെയും പ്രതികളെയും കോടതിയിൽ വിളിച്ചു വരുത്തി പരസ്പര സമ്മതത്തോടെ കേസുകൾ തീർപ്പാക്കുന്ന രീതിയുള്ള സമിതി ഏത് ?

Consider the following statements regarding the CAG’s constitutional role:

Statement I: The CAG is described as a bulwark of India’s democratic system.

Statement II: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called the CAG the most important officer under the Constitution.

Statement III: The CAG’s role is limited to auditing central government accounts only.

Which of the following is correct?