Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements correctly describe the term and removal of the Advocate General?

  1. The Constitution fixes the term of office for the Advocate General as five years.

  2. The Constitution provides a specific procedure for the removal of the Advocate General.

  3. The Advocate General holds office at the pleasure of the Governor.

  4. The Advocate General can be removed by the President of India on the advice of the Governor.

How many of the above statements are correct?

AOnly one

BOnly two

COnly three

DAll four

Answer:

A. Only one

Read Explanation:

Advocate General for the State: Key Provisions and Removal

  • Constitutional Ambit: Article 165 of the Constitution of India deals with the Advocate General for the State.

  • Appointment: The Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the respective state.

  • Qualifications: To be appointed as Advocate General, an individual must be a citizen of India and should have held a judicial office in India for not less than ten years or be an advocate in any High Court for not less than ten years.

  • Term of Office: The Constitution does not specify a fixed term for the Advocate General. They hold office during the pleasure of the Governor.

  • Removal: Similarly, there is no specific procedure for the removal of the Advocate General laid down in the Constitution. The Governor can remove the Advocate General at any time, without assigning any reason, as the office is held 'at the pleasure of the Governor'.

  • Independence: While appointed by the Governor, the Advocate General functions as the chief legal advisor to the state government.

  • Distinction from Attorney General: The Attorney General for India (Article 76) holds office during the pleasure of the President and has qualifications similar to a Supreme Court judge.

Analysis of the Statements:

  • Statement 1 is incorrect because the Constitution does not fix a five-year term for the Advocate General.

  • Statement 2 is incorrect because the Constitution does not provide a specific removal procedure for the Advocate General.

  • Statement 3 is correct as the Advocate General holds office at the pleasure of the Governor.

  • Statement 4 is incorrect because the Advocate General is removed by the Governor, not the President, and there's no requirement for the Governor's advice in such a presidential removal.

Therefore, only one statement (Statement 3) is correct.


Related Questions:

Which of the following statements are true about the scope of the Attorney General's functions?
(i) The Attorney General's primary role is to advise the Government of India on legal matters referred by the President.
(ii) The Attorney General is prohibited from holding a brief against the Government of India.
(iii) The Attorney General must not advise any ministry or department of the Government unless the reference is channeled through the Ministry of Law and Justice.

സാർവത്രിക വോട്ടവകാശം മലസരിക്കാനുള്ള അവകാശം എന്നിവയുമായി ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട് താഴെ പറയുന്നതിൽ ഏറ്റവും അനുയോജ്യമായ വസ്തുതകൾ ഏതാണ്?

  1. 1. സാർവത്രിക വോട്ടവകാശത്തിന്റെ അടിസ്ഥാനത്തിൽ വേണം ലോകസഭാ നിയമസഭാ തിരഞ്ഞെടുപ്പുകൾ നടത്തേണ്ടതെന്ന് വകുപ്പ് 326 - ൽ പ്രതിപാദിക്കുന്നു.
  2. 2. വകുപ്പ് 331- ൽ സാർവത്രിക വോട്ടവകാശത്തെ കുറിച്ച് പറയുന്നു.
  3. 3. 1989 - ലെ 61 -ആം ഭേദഗതിയിലൂടെ വോട്ടവകാശത്തിനുള്ള പ്രായം 21 ൽ നിന്നും 18 ആയി കുറച്ചു.
  4. 4. 1989 - ലെ 62- ആം ഭേദഗതിയിലൂടെ വോട്ടിങ് പ്രായം കുറച്ചു.
    'Per incurium' judgement means:
    Which of the following statements regarding the privileges and immunities of the Advocate General is correct?

    Which statements are true in relation to the Advocate General’s appointment and qualifications?

    i. The Advocate General is appointed by the Governor.

    ii. The Advocate General must have been an advocate for 10 years in a High Court.

    iii. The Advocate General must be a resident of the state they serve.

    iv. The Advocate General must be at least 45 years old.