App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
Which of the following statement(s) is/are incorrect regarding the proclamation of National Emergency in India?

AA National Emergency may be applicable to the entire country or only a part of it.

BAn Emergency can also be proclaimed due to failure of Constitutional machinery.

CThe declaration of a National Emergency is immune from the judicial review.

DIt is no longer possible to declare a National Emergency on the ground of ‘internal disturbance'.

Answer:

C. The declaration of a National Emergency is immune from the judicial review.

Read Explanation:

  • As per the 38th Amendment Act of 1975, there was immunity from the judicial review in case of National Emergency.

  • The provision of immunity was subsequently deleted by the 44th Amendment Act of 1978.


Related Questions:

ഒരു സംസ്ഥാനത്തു രാഷ്ട്രപതി ഭരണം പരമാവധി എത്ര വർഷത്തേക്കു നീട്ടാൻ കഴിയും?

Which of the following statements regarding National Emergency in India are correct?

  1. National Emergency has been declared three times in India’s history.

  2. The first National Emergency was declared due to internal armed rebellion.

  3. The 42nd Amendment made the declaration of Emergency immune from judicial review.

Consider the following statements about the historical imposition of President’s Rule in Kerala.

(i) Kerala experienced President’s Rule seven times, with the last instance in 1982.

(ii) The longest period of President’s Rule in Kerala was from 1964 to 1967.

(iii) The first imposition of President’s Rule in Kerala was in 1959.

സാമ്പത്തിക അടിയന്തരാവസ്ഥ കോടതിയിൽ ചോദ്യം ചെയ്യാൻ സാധിക്കില്ല എന്ന് പ്രതിപാദിക്കുന്ന ഭരണഘടനാ ഭേദഗതി ഏത് ?
സാമ്പത്തിക അടിയന്തിരാവസ്ഥ ഇന്ത്യയിൽ എത്ര തവണ പ്രഖ്യാപിച്ചിട്ടുണ്ട് ?