Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
Which of the following statement(s) is/are incorrect regarding the proclamation of National Emergency in India?

AA National Emergency may be applicable to the entire country or only a part of it.

BAn Emergency can also be proclaimed due to failure of Constitutional machinery.

CThe declaration of a National Emergency is immune from the judicial review.

DIt is no longer possible to declare a National Emergency on the ground of ‘internal disturbance'.

Answer:

C. The declaration of a National Emergency is immune from the judicial review.

Read Explanation:

  • As per the 38th Amendment Act of 1975, there was immunity from the judicial review in case of National Emergency.

  • The provision of immunity was subsequently deleted by the 44th Amendment Act of 1978.


Related Questions:

Who has the authority to declare a financial emergency in India?
The right guaranteed under Article 32 can be suspended :
Proclamation of Financial Emergency has to be approved by Parliament within

Regarding suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency, which are correct?

  1. Article 358 suspends the six Fundamental Rights in Article 19 automatically only during emergencies due to war or external aggression.

  2. Article 359 can suspend enforcement of fundamental rights only during Financial Emergency.

  3. Neither Article 358 nor Article 359 suspends enforcement of Articles 20 and 21.

Examine the following statements about Financial Emergency under Article 360.

a. A Financial Emergency has been declared in India at least once since the Constitution came into force.

b. The President can issue directions to reserve all money bills passed by state legislatures for his consideration during a Financial Emergency.