App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
Why does Eliot argue against poetry as personal expression?

AHe believes poetry should reflect universal truths rather than individual emotions.

BHe dislikes poets who write about personal experiences.

CHe believes poetry is a political tool.

DHe considers personal experiences irrelevant to literature.

Answer:

A. He believes poetry should reflect universal truths rather than individual emotions.

Read Explanation:

T.S. Eliot argues against poetry as personal expression because he believes the poet should act as a "medium" to convey universal emotions and experiences, rather than focusing on their own individual feelings, essentially prioritizing the "impersonality" of the poem over the poet's personal identity; this idea is central to his essay "Tradition and the Individual Talent.". 

Key points of Eliot's argument:

  • The poet as a catalyst:

    Eliot sees the poet as a vessel through which various emotions and experiences are combined and transformed into art, not as a source of unique, personal feelings. 

  • Tradition and the collective unconscious:

    He emphasizes the importance of literary tradition, suggesting that great poetry draws from a shared cultural consciousness rather than just the poet's individual perspective. 

  • Depersonalization of emotion:

    Eliot believes that the "emotion of art" is impersonal, meaning the poet should strive to create a universal emotional response rather than expressing their own specific emotions


Related Questions:

What are Vyabhichari Bhavas?
The unity of action means:
What must a poet do to achieve individuality, according to Eliot?
What is an example of the arbitrariness of the linguistic sign?
What is the function of Vyanjana in Dhwani Theory?