App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
Which of the following statement(s) is/are incorrect regarding the proclamation of National Emergency in India?

AA National Emergency may be applicable to the entire country or only a part of it.

BAn Emergency can also be proclaimed due to failure of Constitutional machinery.

CThe declaration of a National Emergency is immune from the judicial review.

DIt is no longer possible to declare a National Emergency on the ground of ‘internal disturbance'.

Answer:

C. The declaration of a National Emergency is immune from the judicial review.

Read Explanation:

  • As per the 38th Amendment Act of 1975, there was immunity from the judicial review in case of National Emergency.

  • The provision of immunity was subsequently deleted by the 44th Amendment Act of 1978.


Related Questions:

Who declared the third national emergency in India?

Regarding suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency, which are correct?

  1. Article 358 suspends the six Fundamental Rights in Article 19 automatically only during emergencies due to war or external aggression.

  2. Article 359 can suspend enforcement of fundamental rights only during Financial Emergency.

  3. Neither Article 358 nor Article 359 suspends enforcement of Articles 20 and 21.

The emergency powers of the President are modelled on the Constitution from which country?
Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency “ of Indian Constitution was taken from which country?

താഴെ പറയുന്നവയിൽ ശരിയായ പ്രസ്താവന ഏത് ?

  1. ഒരു സംസ്ഥാനത്ത് ഭരണഘടനാപരമായ പ്രതിസന്ധി ഉണ്ടാകുമ്പോഴാണ് രാഷ്ട്രപതിഭരണം പ്രഖ്യാപിക്കുന്നത്.  
  2. രാജ്യത്തിന്റെ സാമ്പത്തിക സ്ഥിതിക്ക് ഭീഷണി ഉണ്ടാകുന്ന അവസരത്തിലാണ് അനുഛേദം 356 അനുസരിച്ച് രാഷ്ട്രപതി സാമ്പത്തിക അടിയന്തരാവസ്ഥ പ്രഖ്യാപിക്കുന്നത്.