Aഅശ്വവിർ W. ഗജ്ഭിയേ
Bകാഞ്ച ഇളയ്യ
Cബി. ശിവ റാവു
Dമഹേന്ദ്ര പി. സിംഗ്
Aഅശ്വവിർ W. ഗജ്ഭിയേ
Bകാഞ്ച ഇളയ്യ
Cബി. ശിവ റാവു
Dമഹേന്ദ്ര പി. സിംഗ്
Related Questions:
Which of the following statements is/are correct about the appointment and tenure of the CAG?
i. The CAG is appointed by the President of India and holds office for a term of 6 years or until the age of 65, whichever is earlier.
ii. The CAG can be removed by the President on the same grounds and in the same manner as a judge of the Supreme Court.
iii. The CAG is eligible for further office under the Government of India or any state after ceasing to hold office.
iv. The salary of the CAG is determined by the President and can be altered to the CAG’s disadvantage during their tenure.
With reference to the duties of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, consider the following statements:
i. The CAG audits all receipts and expenditures of bodies substantially financed from central or state revenues.
ii. The CAG has the authority to prescribe the form of accounts for the Centre and states under Article 150.
iii. The CAG audits the accounts of private companies not receiving government funds.
iv. The CAG acts as a guide, friend, and philosopher to the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Consider the following statements regarding the Advocate General and compare to the Attorney General:
i. Both the Advocate General and the Attorney General are the highest law officers at their respective levels (state and union).
ii. Both hold office at the pleasure of their respective appointing authorities (Governor for AG, President for AGI).
iii. The qualifications for both involve experience as an advocate in a High Court for a specified number of years.
iv. The Constitution fixes a five-year term for both offices to ensure stability.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Consider the following statements regarding the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956:
The Act empowers the Central government to establish a tribunal for adjudicating disputes related to inter-state river waters.
The decisions of the tribunal are advisory and not binding on the parties involved.
The Supreme Court retains jurisdiction over disputes referred to the tribunal under this Act.