ANo, as it is not an integral part of Constitution
BYes, as it is an Integral Part of Constitution
CYes, as it is not a integral Part of Constitution
DNone of the above
ANo, as it is not an integral part of Constitution
BYes, as it is an Integral Part of Constitution
CYes, as it is not a integral Part of Constitution
DNone of the above
Related Questions:
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the 101st Constitutional Amendment (GST)?
i. The GST Bill was signed by President Pranab Mukherjee on 8 September 2016.
ii. The 101st Amendment amended Articles 248 to 286, among others, to facilitate GST implementation.
iii. Compensation to States for revenue loss due to GST was provided for a period of three years.
Which among the following statements are not true with regard to the 104th Constitutional Amendment?
The 104th Amendment extended reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha and State Legislatures until January 2030.
The 104th Amendment abolished reservations for Anglo-Indian representatives in the Lok Sabha and State Legislatures.
The 104th Amendment amended Article 338.
The 104th Amendment was introduced in the Lok Sabha by Ravi Shankar Prasad.
Consider the following statements:
A constitutional amendment bill can be passed by a joint sitting of both houses of Parliament.
The President must give his assent to a constitutional amendment bill.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?