Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Consider the following statements about Kerala's economic performance. Which of them are true?

  1. Kerala's Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) has shown consistent expansion across different phases.
  2. In Phase 3, Kerala's GSDP growth rate reached 6.97 percent.
  3. Despite encouraging GSDP growth, a comparison of Kerala's economic development with other states reveals no areas of concern.

    Aരണ്ടും മൂന്നും

    Bഒന്ന്

    Cഒന്നും രണ്ടും

    Dഒന്നും മൂന്നും

    Answer:

    C. ഒന്നും രണ്ടും

    Read Explanation:

    Understanding Kerala's Economic Performance

    Statement 1: Consistent GSDP Expansion

    • Kerala's Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) has indeed demonstrated a consistent upward trend across various periods. This indicates an overall increase in the total value of goods and services produced within the state over time.

    • Despite facing global economic downturns, natural calamities, or specific policy impacts, the state's economy has generally maintained an expansionary path, contributing to its overall development.

    Statement 2: GSDP Growth Rate in Phase 3

    • It is accurate that in particular analytical periods, often referred to as 'phases' in economic studies and surveys, Kerala's GSDP growth rate has reached specific figures like 6.97 percent. This indicates periods of robust economic expansion for the state.

    • Economic performance analysis frequently categorizes data into distinct phases to better understand growth patterns, the impact of various policies, and external factors.

    Statement 3: Areas of Concern in Economic Development

    • The statement that a comparison of Kerala's economic development with other states reveals no areas of concern is incorrect.

    • While Kerala is widely acclaimed for its achievements in human development indicators (such as literacy, healthcare, and life expectancy) – often termed the 'Kerala Model' – its economic growth trajectory does present several challenges when compared to other major states.

    Key areas of concern include:

    • Low industrial growth: Kerala has historically lagged in rapid industrialization, often trailing states with strong manufacturing and industrial bases.

    • Dependence on remittances: A substantial portion of Kerala's economy is sustained by remittances from non-resident Keralites, particularly those in the Gulf countries. This dependence makes the state's economy vulnerable to fluctuations in global oil prices and geopolitical shifts.

    • Fiscal challenges: The state frequently encounters issues related to its fiscal health, including a relatively high revenue deficit and escalating public debt.

    • Job creation: Despite high educational attainment among its populace, in-state job creation, especially in the manufacturing and organized private sectors, remains a significant challenge, often leading to outward migration for employment opportunities.


    Related Questions:

    What is the monthly financial assistance provided under the Abhayakiranam scheme to the caregiver of destitute widows?
    A key difference between decentralized planning and market-based solutions is that decentralized planning:
    Within the public sector in Kerala (2023-24), which category employed the highest percentage of people?

    Identify the correct statements regarding the beneficiary distribution under the Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY).

    1. 50% of the benefits were reserved for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (SCs/STs).
    2. 40% of the benefits were allocated for physically handicapped persons.
    3. 40% of the benefits were reserved for women.
    4. There were no specific reservations for women or persons with disabilities.
      In decentralized planning, the role of the central government is to provide