Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads
Find the correct answer regarding Administering Oath of High Courts Chief Justice and other Judges

ABy the Governor of concerned states

BBefore the Chief Justice of India

CBefore the President of India

DBefore the Chief Minister of concerned states

Answer:

A. By the Governor of concerned states

Read Explanation:

  • Constitutional Provision: Article 219 of the Constitution of India deals with the oath or affirmation to be made by Judges of High Courts.
  • Authority: The Chief Justice and other judges of a High Court are required to make and subscribe an oath or affirmation before the Governor of the State or some person appointed by him for this purpose.
  • Form of Oath: The form of oath is prescribed in the Third Schedule of the Constitution.
  • Content of Oath: The oath requires the judge to:
    • Bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established.
    • Uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India.
    • Duly and faithfully and to the best of his ability, knowledge, and judgment, perform the duties of the office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.
    • Uphold the Constitution and the laws.
  • Comparison: While the President appoints the judges of the High Court, the administration of the oath is explicitly delegated to the Governor of the respective state.
  • Related Appointments: The Chief Justice of a High Court is appointed by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Governor of the state. Other judges are appointed by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the Governor of the state, and the Chief Justice of that specific High Court.

Related Questions:

When a Judge of a High Court in India, including the Chief Justice, wishes to resign from office, to whom must they submit their resignation?
ഇന്ത്യൻ ഭരണഘടനയുടെ ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 124(2) അനുസരിച്ച് ഇന്ത്യൻ സുപ്രീം കോടതിയിലെ ജഡ്ജിമാരുടെ വിരമിക്കൽ പ്രായം?
Which of the following disputes falls under the Supreme Court's exclusive original jurisdiction as per Article 131 of the Indian Constitution?

Which among the following statements is/are not correct with regard to the advisory Jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India?

1. The President can refer a question of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court of India.

2. The Supreme Court is bound to give its observation in the matter

3. The President is bound by the opinion of Supreme Court.

4. The judge who does not concur may deliver a dissenting judgement

The Article 131 of the Indian Constitution deals with :