Challenger Logo

Challenger App

Get it on Google PlayGet it on App Store
Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads
Get App
How are task-oriented and relationship-oriented leadership styles viewed in Fiedler’s theory?

AOnly the task-oriented style is effective

BOnly the relationship-oriented style is effective

CBoth are useful but apply to different contexts

DNeither style is important for leadership effectiveness

Answer:

C. Both are useful but apply to different contexts

Read Explanation:

  • Fiedler recognized the value of both styles, but their effectiveness depends on the type of situation the leader faces.

Related Questions:

What was the key conclusion of Joan Woodward’s study on 100 manufacturing firms?
According to the LPC Scale, what does a low LPC score indicate about a leader’s style?

Consider the following statements regarding Division of Work by Gulick:

I. The most important principle is Division of Work (specialisation); work division is the foundation of organization and reason for organization.

II. Division of work and integration are the bootstraps by which mankind lifts itself in the process of civilization.

III. Gulick viewed integration as unnecessary, emphasizing only division without any coordinating mechanisms.

What tool does Fiedler’s Contingency Theory use to determine a leader’s style?
The contingency theory of administration focuses on: