Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option. Statement: The discovery of exoplanets in habitable zones around distant stars has provided exciting prospects for the search for extraterrestrial life, yet the vast distances and technological limitations pose significant obstacles to direct exploration. Assumptions: I. Exoplanets located in habitable zones may have the potential to support life. Il. Current technology is insufficient to directly explore exoplanets in habitable zones. IlI. Direct exploration of exoplanets will be unnecessary if we detect signs of life remotely.

AOnly I and Il are implicit

BOnly Il and Ill are implicit

COnly I is implicit

DAll assumptions are implicit

Answer:

A. Only I and Il are implicit

Read Explanation:

The statement says:

  • Exoplanets in habitable zones create exciting possibilities for finding extraterrestrial life.

  • But huge distances and technological limitations make direct exploration difficult.

Now check the assumptions:

I. Habitable Zone planets may support life.
This is assumed, because the excitement about searching for extraterrestrial life depends on this possibility.

II. Current technology is insufficient for direct exploration.
This is also assumed, since the statement mentions technological limitations as obstacles.

III. Direct exploration will be unnecessary if life is detected remotely.
This is not assumed anywhere in the statement.

Therefore, only Assumptions I and II are valid.


Related Questions:

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All clocks are bulbs. All fingers are bulbs. Conclusions: (I) : No clocks are fingers. (II) : Some bulbs are clocks.

Read the given statements) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements).

Statements:

Some cups are glasses.

No cup is a plate.

Conclusions:

(I) No glass is a plate.

(Il) Some glasses are not cups.

A, B, C, L, M, Y and X are sitting around a circular table facing the centre (but not necessarily in the same order). Only two people sit between B and L when counted from the right of L. X sits to the immediate left of Y. A sits to the immediate right of M. Y is an immediate neighbour of L. Who sits fourth to the right of C?
In a certain code language, 'he may eat rice' is written as 'ki mi ji li' and 'she will like rice' is written as 'ni gi mi pi' How is 'rice' written in the given language?
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All leaves are trees. Some trees are plants. Conclusions: (l) Some leaves are plants. (Il) All leaves are trees.