Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option.

Statement: Despite the unpredictability of future technologies, regulatory frameworks must evolve to preempt ethical crises.

Assumptions:

I. Unregulated technological growth can cause ethical dilemmas.

Il. Ethical standards are often retrofitted to existing technology.

IlI. Regulatory systems can always accurately predict technological outcomes.

AOnly I and II are implicit

BOnly I is implicit

CAll are implicit

DOnly II and III are implicit

Answer:

A. Only I and II are implicit

Read Explanation:

Let's examine each assumption:

Statement:

Despite the unpredictability of future technologies, regulatory frameworks must evolve to preempt ethical crises.

Assumption I:

"Unregulated technological growth can cause ethical dilemmas."
Valid.
The statement argues that regulations should evolve to prevent ethical crises, which assumes that without adequate regulation, technology may indeed create ethical problems.

Assumption II:

"Ethical standards are often retrofitted to existing technology."
Valid.
The use of the word "preempt" implies that waiting until after technology is developed is undesirable, suggesting that ethical standards have often been applied only after technologies already exist.

Assumption III:

"Regulatory systems can always accurately predict technological outcomes."
Not valid.
The statement explicitly acknowledges the unpredictability of future technologies. It only says regulations should evolve to anticipate ethical issues, not that regulators can always predict outcomes accurately.

Answer:

Only I and II are implicit


Related Questions:

Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements).

Statements: Some cakes are sweets. All sweets are fruits.

Conclusions:

(I) Some fruits are sweets.

(Il) All cakes are fruits.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some peanuts are engines. All coats are shoes. All shoes are engines. Conclusions: (I) All coats are engines. (II) Some peanuts are coats
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some bugs are ants. Some ants are snakes. Conclusions: (I) : Some bugs are snakes. (II) : All snakes are ants.

Read the given statements) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements).

Statements:

No teacher is a male.

No male is an Engineer.

Conclusions:

I. No teacher is an Engineer.

Il. Some male are teachers.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

Some hooks are rags.

• All rags are bottles.

Conclusions:

(I) Some bottles are hooks.

(II) All bottles are rags.